|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 18/26] xen/domctl: wrap xsm_getdomaininfo() with CONFIG_MGMT_HYPERCALLS
On 25.09.2025 11:41, Penny, Zheng wrote:
> [Public]
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 9:30 PM
>> To: Penny, Zheng <penny.zheng@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Huang, Ray <Ray.Huang@xxxxxxx>; Daniel P. Smith
>> <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/26] xen/domctl: wrap xsm_getdomaininfo() with
>> CONFIG_MGMT_HYPERCALLS
>>
>> On 10.09.2025 09:38, Penny Zheng wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h
>>> +++ b/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h
>>> @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ struct xsm_ops {
>>> void (*security_domaininfo)(struct domain *d,
>>> struct xen_domctl_getdomaininfo *info);
>>> int (*domain_create)(struct domain *d, uint32_t ssidref);
>>> - int (*getdomaininfo)(struct domain *d);
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_MGMT_HYPERCALLS
>>> + int (*getdomaininfo)(struct domain *d);
>>> int (*domctl_scheduler_op)(struct domain *d, int op);
>>> int (*sysctl_scheduler_op)(int op);
>>> int (*set_target)(struct domain *d, struct domain *e); @@ -234,7
>>> +234,11 @@ static inline int xsm_domain_create(
>>>
>>> static inline int xsm_getdomaininfo(xsm_default_t def, struct domain
>>> *d) {
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MGMT_HYPERCALLS
>>> return alternative_call(xsm_ops.getdomaininfo, d);
>>> +#else
>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +#endif
>>> }
>>
>> This is in use by a Xenstore sysctl and a Xenstore domctl. The sysctl is
>> hence
>> already broken with the earlier series. Now the domctl is also being screwed
>> up. I
>> don't think MGMT_HYPERCALLS really ought to extend to any operations
>> available
>> to other than the core toolstack. That's the Xenstore ones here, but also
>> the ones
>> used by qemu (whether run in Dom0 or a stubdom).
>
> Maybe not only limited to the core toolstack. In dom0less/hyperlaunched
> scenarios, hypercalls are strictly limited. QEMU is also limited to pvh
> machine type and with very restricted functionality(, only acting as a few
> virtio-pci devices backend). @Andryuk, Jason @Stabellini, Stefano Am I
> understanding correctly and thoroughly about our scenario here for upstream?
> Tracking the codes, if Xenstore is created as a stub domain, it requires
> getdomaininfo-domctl to acquire related info. Sorry, I haven't found how it
> was called in QEMU...
It's not "it"; it's different ones. First and foremost I was thinking of
* XEN_DOMCTL_ioport_mapping
* XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping
* XEN_DOMCTL_bind_pt_irq
* XEN_DOMCTL_unbind_pt_irq
but there may be others (albeit per the dummy xsm_domctl() this is the full
set). As a general criteria, anything using XSM_DM_PRIV checking can in
principle be called by qemu.
Jan
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |