[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] xen/cpufreq: Adapt SET/GET_CPUFREQ_CPPC xen_sysctl_pm_op for amd-cppc driver


  • To: Penny Zheng <Penny.Zheng@xxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 14:33:42 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 12:33:53 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 04.09.2025 08:35, Penny Zheng wrote:
> Introduce helper set_amd_cppc_para() and get_amd_cppc_para() to
> SET/GET CPPC-related para for amd-cppc/amd-cppc-epp driver.
> 
> In get_cpufreq_cppc()/set_cpufreq_cppc(), we include
> "processor_pminfo[cpuid]->init & XEN_CPPC_INIT" condition check to deal with
> cpufreq driver in amd-cppc.
> We borrow governor field to indicate policy info for CPPC active mode,
> so we need to move the copying of the governor name out of the
> !cpufreq_is_governorless() guard.

Well, as said in my v8 comment - it's not so much the "what" that needs 
covering,
but the "why is it correct / safe to do so". See my respective reply to patch 5,
and also to Jason's response on the v8 thread. Perhaps with the union there
removed this doesn't need calling out explicitly anymore.

> ---
> v8 -> v9
> - add description of "moving the copying of the governor name"
> - Adapt to changes of "Embed struct amd_cppc_drv_data{} into struct
> cpufreq_policy{}"

Except that again problems extend to here as well.

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/amd-cppc.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/amd-cppc.c
> @@ -561,6 +561,169 @@ static int cf_check amd_cppc_epp_set_policy(struct 
> cpufreq_policy *policy)
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_OP
> +int amd_cppc_get_para(const struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> +                      struct xen_get_cppc_para *cppc_para)
> +{
> +    const struct amd_cppc_drv_data *data = policy->u.amd_cppc;
> +
> +    if ( data == NULL )
> +        return -ENODATA;
> +
> +    cppc_para->lowest           = data->caps.lowest_perf;
> +    cppc_para->lowest_nonlinear = data->caps.lowest_nonlinear_perf;
> +    cppc_para->nominal          = data->caps.nominal_perf;
> +    cppc_para->highest          = data->caps.highest_perf;
> +    cppc_para->minimum          = data->req.min_perf;
> +    cppc_para->maximum          = data->req.max_perf;
> +    cppc_para->desired          = data->req.des_perf;
> +    cppc_para->energy_perf      = data->req.epp;
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int amd_cppc_set_para(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> +                      const struct xen_set_cppc_para *set_cppc)
> +{
> +    struct amd_cppc_drv_data *data = policy->u.amd_cppc;
> +    uint8_t max_perf, min_perf, des_perf, epp;
> +    bool active_mode = cpufreq_is_governorless(policy->cpu);
> +
> +    if ( data == NULL )
> +        return -ENOENT;
> +
> +    /* Only allow values if params bit is set. */
> +    if ( (!(set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_DESIRED) &&
> +          set_cppc->desired) ||
> +         (!(set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_MINIMUM) &&
> +          set_cppc->minimum) ||
> +         (!(set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_MAXIMUM) &&
> +          set_cppc->maximum) ||
> +         (!(set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_ENERGY_PERF) &&
> +          set_cppc->energy_perf) )
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +
> +    /* Return if there is nothing to do. */
> +    if ( set_cppc->set_params == 0 )
> +        return 0;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Validate all parameters
> +     * Maximum performance may be set to any performance value in the range
> +     * [Nonlinear Lowest Performance, Highest Performance], inclusive but 
> must
> +     * be set to a value that is larger than or equal to minimum Performance.
> +     */
> +    if ( (set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_MAXIMUM) &&
> +         (set_cppc->maximum > data->caps.highest_perf ||
> +          (set_cppc->maximum <
> +           (set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_MINIMUM
> +            ? set_cppc->minimum
> +            : data->req.min_perf))) )
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +    /*
> +     * Minimum performance may be set to any performance value in the range
> +     * [Nonlinear Lowest Performance, Highest Performance], inclusive but 
> must
> +     * be set to a value that is less than or equal to Maximum Performance.
> +     */
> +    if ( (set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_MINIMUM) &&
> +         (set_cppc->minimum < data->caps.lowest_nonlinear_perf ||
> +          (set_cppc->minimum >
> +           (set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_MAXIMUM
> +            ? set_cppc->maximum
> +            : data->req.max_perf))) )
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +    /*
> +     * Desired performance may be set to any performance value in the range
> +     * [Minimum Performance, Maximum Performance], inclusive.
> +     */
> +    if ( set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_DESIRED )
> +    {
> +        if ( active_mode )
> +            return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +        if ( (set_cppc->desired >
> +              (set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_MAXIMUM
> +               ? set_cppc->maximum
> +               : data->req.max_perf)) ||
> +             (set_cppc->desired <
> +              (set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_MINIMUM
> +               ? set_cppc->minimum
> +               : data->req.min_perf)) )
> +            return -EINVAL;
> +    }
> +    /*
> +     * Energy Performance Preference may be set with a range of values
> +     * from 0 to 0xFF
> +     */
> +    if ( set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_ENERGY_PERF )
> +    {
> +        if ( !active_mode )
> +            return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +        if ( set_cppc->energy_perf > UINT8_MAX )
> +            return -EINVAL;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Activity window not supported in MSR */
> +    if ( set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_ACT_WINDOW )
> +        return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +    des_perf = data->req.des_perf;
> +    /*
> +     * Apply presets:
> +     * XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_PRESET_POWERSAVE/PERFORMANCE/ONDEMAND are
> +     * only available when CPPC in active mode
> +     */
> +    switch ( set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_PRESET_MASK )
> +    {
> +    case XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_PRESET_POWERSAVE:
> +        if ( !active_mode )
> +            return -EINVAL;
> +        policy->policy = CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE;
> +        break;
> +
> +    case XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_PRESET_PERFORMANCE:
> +        if ( !active_mode )
> +            return -EINVAL;
> +        policy->policy = CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE;
> +        break;
> +
> +    case XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_PRESET_ONDEMAND:
> +        if ( !active_mode )
> +            return -EINVAL;
> +        policy->policy = CPUFREQ_POLICY_ONDEMAND;
> +        break;
> +
> +    case XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_PRESET_NONE:
> +        if ( active_mode )
> +            policy->policy = CPUFREQ_POLICY_UNKNOWN;
> +        break;
> +
> +    default:
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +    }
> +    amd_cppc_prepare_policy(policy, &max_perf, &min_perf, &epp);
> +
> +    /* Further customize presets if needed */
> +    if ( set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_MINIMUM )
> +        min_perf = set_cppc->minimum;
> +
> +    if ( set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_MAXIMUM )
> +        max_perf = set_cppc->maximum;
> +
> +    if ( set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_ENERGY_PERF )
> +        epp = set_cppc->energy_perf;
> +
> +    if ( set_cppc->set_params & XEN_SYSCTL_CPPC_SET_DESIRED )
> +        des_perf = set_cppc->desired;
> +
> +    amd_cppc_write_request(policy->cpu, data,

Like elsewhere, policy->cpu may not be online.

> --- a/xen/drivers/acpi/pm-op.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/pm-op.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ static int get_cpufreq_cppc(unsigned int cpu,
>  
>      if ( hwp_active() )
>          ret = get_hwp_para(cpu, cppc_para);
> +    else if ( processor_pminfo[cpu]->init & XEN_CPPC_INIT )
> +        ret = amd_cppc_get_para(per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_policy, cpu), cppc_para);
>  
>      return ret;
>  }
> @@ -154,6 +156,17 @@ static int get_cpufreq_para(struct xen_sysctl_pm_op *op)
>      else
>          strlcpy(op->u.get_para.scaling_driver, "Unknown", CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
>  
> +    /*
> +     * In CPPC active mode, we are borrowing governor field to indicate
> +     * policy info.
> +     */
> +    if ( policy->governor->name[0] )
> +        strlcpy(op->u.get_para.u.s.scaling_governor,
> +                policy->governor->name, CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
> +    else
> +        strlcpy(op->u.get_para.u.s.scaling_governor, "Unknown",
> +                CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
> +
>      if ( !cpufreq_is_governorless(op->cpuid) )
>      {
>          if ( !(scaling_available_governors =
> @@ -178,13 +191,6 @@ static int get_cpufreq_para(struct xen_sysctl_pm_op *op)
>          op->u.get_para.u.s.scaling_max_freq = policy->max;
>          op->u.get_para.u.s.scaling_min_freq = policy->min;
>  
> -        if ( policy->governor->name[0] )
> -            strlcpy(op->u.get_para.u.s.scaling_governor,
> -                    policy->governor->name, CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
> -        else
> -            strlcpy(op->u.get_para.u.s.scaling_governor, "Unknown",
> -                    CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);

Just to re-iterate here: Pulling this out is okay because the union has
no other member anymore, and hence other date cannot be badly impacted.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.