[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry
On 2025/8/12 0:03, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote: > On 06/08/2025 09:11, Jinjie Ruan wrote: > >> On 2025/8/5 23:08, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote: >>> Hi Jinjie, >>> >>> On 29/07/2025 02:54, Jinjie Ruan wrote: >>> >>>> Since commit a70e9f647f50 ("entry: Split generic entry into generic >>>> exception and syscall entry") split the generic entry into generic irq >>>> entry and generic syscall entry, it is time to convert arm64 to use >>>> the generic irq entry. And ARM64 will be completely converted to >>>> generic >>>> entry in the upcoming patch series. >>> Note : I had to manually cherry-pick a70e9f647f50 when pulling the >>> series >>> on top of the Linux Arm Kernel for-next/core branch, but there might be >>> something I'm missing here. >> It seems that it is now in mainline v6.16-rc1 and linux-next but not >> Linux Arm Kernel for-next/core branch. > You're right, I misinterpreted the `-next` of the subject, thanks for the > clarification ! >>> I'll spend some time testing the series now, specifically given patch >>> 6's >>> changes, but other than that everything I saw made sense and didn't look >>> like it would be of concern to me. >> Thank you for the test and review. > > I've spent some time testing the series with a few different > configurations, > including PREEMPT_RT, pNMI, various lockup and hang detection options, > UBSAN, shadow call stack, and various CONFIG_DEBUG_XYZ (focused on locks > and IRQs), on both hardware (AMD Seattle) and KVM guests. > > I tried to generate a diverse set of interrupts (via debug exceptions, > page faults, perf, kprobes, swapping, OoM) while loading the system with > different workloads, some generating a lot of context switches : hackbench > and signaltest from rt-tests[0], and mc-crusher[1], a memcached > stress-test. > > I did not have any issues, nor any warning reported by the various > debug features during all my hours of testing, so it looks good ! > > Tested-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@xxxxxxx> Thank you for your comprehensive testing and code review. > > Thank you for the series ! > Ada > > [0]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/rt-tests/rt-tests.git/ > [1]: https://github.com/memcached/mc-crusher > >
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |