[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 19/20] xen/riscv: add support of page lookup by GFN


  • To: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 15:25:09 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>, Bob Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@xxxxxxxxx>, Connor Davis <connojdavis@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 13:25:19 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 31.07.2025 17:58, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> Introduce helper functions for safely querying the P2M (physical-to-machine)
> mapping:
>  - add p2m_read_lock(), p2m_read_unlock(), and p2m_is_locked() for managing
>    P2M lock state.
>  - Implement p2m_get_entry() to retrieve mapping details for a given GFN,
>    including MFN, page order, and validity.
>  - Add p2m_lookup() to encapsulate read-locked MFN retrieval.
>  - Introduce p2m_get_page_from_gfn() to convert a GFN into a page_info
>    pointer, acquiring a reference to the page if valid.
>  - Introduce get_page().
> 
> Implementations are based on Arm's functions with some minor modifications:
> - p2m_get_entry():
>   - Reverse traversal of page tables, as RISC-V uses the opposite level
>     numbering compared to Arm.
>   - Removed the return of p2m_access_t from p2m_get_entry() since
>     mem_access_settings is not introduced for RISC-V.
>   - Updated BUILD_BUG_ON() to check using the level 0 mask, which corresponds
>     to Arm's THIRD_MASK.
>   - Replaced open-coded bit shifts with the BIT() macro.
>   - Other minor changes, such as using RISC-V-specific functions to validate
>     P2M PTEs, and replacing Arm-specific GUEST_* macros with their RISC-V
>     equivalents.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in V3:
>  - Add is_p2m_foreign() macro and connected stuff.

What is this about?

> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/p2m.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/p2m.h
> @@ -202,6 +202,24 @@ static inline int p2m_is_write_locked(struct p2m_domain 
> *p2m)
>  
>  unsigned long construct_hgatp(struct p2m_domain *p2m, uint16_t vmid);
>  
> +static inline void p2m_read_lock(struct p2m_domain *p2m)
> +{
> +    read_lock(&p2m->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void p2m_read_unlock(struct p2m_domain *p2m)
> +{
> +    read_unlock(&p2m->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int p2m_is_locked(struct p2m_domain *p2m)

bool return type (also for p2m_is_write_locked() in patch 11)? Also perhaps
pointer-to-const parameter?

> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/p2m.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/p2m.c
> @@ -852,3 +852,139 @@ int map_regions_p2mt(struct domain *d,
>  {
>      return p2m_insert_mapping(p2m_get_hostp2m(d), gfn, nr, mfn, p2mt);
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * Get the details of a given gfn.
> + *
> + * If the entry is present, the associated MFN will be returned type filled 
> up.

This sentence doesn't really parse, perhaps due to missing words.

> + * The page_order will correspond to the order of the mapping in the page
> + * table (i.e it could be a superpage).
> + *
> + * If the entry is not present, INVALID_MFN will be returned and the
> + * page_order will be set according to the order of the invalid range.
> + *
> + * valid will contain the value of bit[0] (e.g valid bit) of the
> + * entry.
> + */
> +static mfn_t p2m_get_entry(struct p2m_domain *p2m, gfn_t gfn,
> +                           p2m_type_t *t,
> +                           unsigned int *page_order,
> +                           bool *valid)
> +{
> +    unsigned int level = 0;
> +    pte_t entry, *table;
> +    int rc;
> +    mfn_t mfn = INVALID_MFN;
> +    DECLARE_OFFSETS(offsets, gfn_to_gaddr(gfn));
> +
> +    ASSERT(p2m_is_locked(p2m));
> +    BUILD_BUG_ON(XEN_PT_LEVEL_MAP_MASK(0) != PAGE_MASK);

What function-wide property is this check about? Even when moved ...

> +    if ( valid )
> +        *valid = false;
> +
> +    /* XXX: Check if the mapping is lower than the mapped gfn */

(Nested: What is this about?)

> +    /* This gfn is higher than the highest the p2m map currently holds */
> +    if ( gfn_x(gfn) > gfn_x(p2m->max_mapped_gfn) )
> +    {
> +        for ( level = P2M_ROOT_LEVEL; level; level-- )
> +            if ( (gfn_x(gfn) & (XEN_PT_LEVEL_MASK(level) >> PAGE_SHIFT)) >

... into the more narrow scope where another XEN_PT_LEVEL_MASK() exists I
can't really spot what the check is to guard against.

> +                 gfn_x(p2m->max_mapped_gfn) )
> +                break;
> +
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +
> +    table = p2m_get_root_pointer(p2m, gfn);
> +
> +    /*
> +     * the table should always be non-NULL because the gfn is below
> +     * p2m->max_mapped_gfn and the root table pages are always present.
> +     */

Nit: Style.

> +    if ( !table )
> +    {
> +        ASSERT_UNREACHABLE();
> +        level = P2M_ROOT_LEVEL;
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +
> +    for ( level = P2M_ROOT_LEVEL; level; level-- )
> +    {
> +        rc = p2m_next_level(p2m, true, level, &table, offsets[level]);

Why would you blindly allocate a page table (hierarchy) here? If anything,
this may need doing upon caller request (as it's only up the call chain
where the necessary knowledge exists). For example, ...

> +static mfn_t p2m_lookup(struct p2m_domain *p2m, gfn_t gfn, p2m_type_t *t)
> +{
> +    mfn_t mfn;
> +
> +    p2m_read_lock(p2m);
> +    mfn = p2m_get_entry(p2m, gfn, t, NULL, NULL);

... this (by its name) pretty likely won't want allocation, while ...

> +    p2m_read_unlock(p2m);
> +
> +    return mfn;
> +}
> +
> +struct page_info *p2m_get_page_from_gfn(struct p2m_domain *p2m, gfn_t gfn,
> +                                        p2m_type_t *t)
> +{

... this will. Yet then ...

> +    struct page_info *page;
> +    p2m_type_t p2mt = p2m_invalid;
> +    mfn_t mfn = p2m_lookup(p2m, gfn, t);

... you use the earlier one here.

> +    if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) )
> +        return NULL;
> +
> +    if ( t )
> +        p2mt = *t;
> +
> +    page = mfn_to_page(mfn);
> +
> +    /*
> +     * get_page won't work on foreign mapping because the page doesn't
> +     * belong to the current domain.
> +     */
> +    if ( p2m_is_foreign(p2mt) )
> +    {
> +        struct domain *fdom = page_get_owner_and_reference(page);
> +        ASSERT(fdom != NULL);
> +        ASSERT(fdom != p2m->domain);
> +        return page;

In a release build (with no assertions) this will be wrong if either of the
two condition would not be satisfied. See x86'es respective code.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.