[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v7 5/6] xen/arm: ffa: Add indirect message between VM


  • To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 07:11:07 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 4.158.2.129) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=arm.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=L6uLJbDflK3g1YEpqtCmMHOkZCFWEKxWzHhlvwB/FTk=; b=KuGvURduKQ7kriPg1n8luIHBI9Kdx4xQABdR4bNTsqu2wgIscRmrVdLgV2OHXF1R8/O0schHymnVw63Co3QSGUHvVBoSgvgCNzzuaOojjqKrm6SMExa7vXQ61BfZadF6BJFWE0WyZhGgJ2lZkbAMb8o3wAoug55GgprVlMMHjQke+dxTpjn6sKwKR7HQBSFT1SsFhBiPqR3iKPQInceBL006qjjlM1NWlw5iqYHixzlD7+R924WM2KxY44JL5aFM1MwwHFoYOwB12SsEXC0/o48FufLtDZ9w8yz2xk3YaSjOI0y2xDA5eCyImwo27Voa304vU1nCxeG4lcmgRQ9rNA==
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=L6uLJbDflK3g1YEpqtCmMHOkZCFWEKxWzHhlvwB/FTk=; b=kvBhnMXIQjx0RcHx3j3QOvWTMGVo+ypAhXzgKSMuwHd3hdZLqN3yylpghm/16DZhMscC9Zv8y7GUsi7P6tnDkYXtryGumdX3LK6I/YOig6it2E1mxh3nj9SkFgIqPnLJmgL5sTGxtBzjm0rh+JCYp5W8R5hCQdRwgOFJS1eruCIg7wJZ0NU02FItp2JMfwBhpFL4L4KTgiUN6CK5bpIi+03fbIUh5T0elocXf+IZjWpvS6hMdQILaueXDxQQNZLdcsDGHzoQ9ZgZZCXIikW81afyyt6/0pXtArPak/PI3G4H+/0HDMDnC8SLgBQvH8c4kS2mQMwTNx0o9sk2czOQAQ==
  • Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=x4VHkDqyN71OnMrJJHPHimQb/FkqJvEyqp4GVU/rJLpUnqS7B/EdLrVjC2aL3jjCdFD6PmtljGN/Kv9Os06KIW5qRgwSevBg9F4CV7s8Y31p1I062kOWPAyiin+UHG16fqQj8wxewdEy0vv9zpTy/K7HI2WtFsGvtWqL8muZEUSTTL+RIZd8qWJkdz1zmeUeFbVKZvCY30z0AY5WhXbAYLBHvjo+C97C4REPOlhj2TVsMObyD+416OODmfN0Hpa0BTHG3Z7g7g+dbIQzWLcHiOqACzM+85hwlfmwC3DQ+HzpyDxCEPXcNgoKj2I5R69fQBJGTJ3dEqUe5akFeiSQtA==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=fyIZbIxjmLwiRU819OUPNcG8ImLPVDuEO1xTtZx7Sep32X6xt/YqfKtR0C81hGbimH+9EPc6AVjziT7vbw7Q0AtWqVvQta9k4gaue1kAPy097GRqblwDzUPyj+NoQPirWAJLawFXuoAFngrC9TGQd1CzsF6EbphAl1heQCVRXrto61Ijeq5fVBBqvPNA0J2ZkjAl4M2Ps5na2cbIMh2y6yFhkDm6ix2BLvtF4fnU4xbK4zh4wKAY13HtapbxSe9YToQlCVGldYLSWQKU8ClvKTuHmej1tg+1zQsWC74WtxwPpkm4lnCuY/uIgZjqM+Qiuqy/2vOxNZvHhYgORPGxcQ==
  • Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
  • Cc: "jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx" <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 01 Aug 2025 07:11:47 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Nodisclaimer: true
  • Thread-index: AQHb9xP63AO3xKXxGUS6VQz+IbmVObRNeLKA
  • Thread-topic: [PATCH v7 5/6] xen/arm: ffa: Add indirect message between VM

Hi,

A gentle ping for someone to review this :-)

Thanks
Bertrand

> On 17 Jul 2025, at 14:11, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Add support for indirect messages between VMs.
> This is only enabled if CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM is selected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v6:
> - fix code alignment (Jens)
> - add Jens R-b
> Changes in v5:
> - Prevent potential overflow in send2 handling (Julien)
> - Only use page_count with rx lock acquired
> - Fix an issue where send2 between VMs was not doing the copy from the
>  tx buffer but from a wrong location in the stack. This bug was
>  introduced in v4 when switching to a local copy for the header.
> Changes in v4:
> - Use a local copy of the message header to prevent a TOC/TOU possible
>  issue when using the payload size
> Changes in v3:
> - Move vm to vm indirect message handling in a sub function to simplify
>  lock handling and make implementation easier to read
> Changes in v2:
> - Switch ifdef to IS_ENABLED
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_msg.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_msg.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_msg.c
> index ee594e737fc7..c20c5bec0f76 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_msg.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_msg.c
> @@ -88,43 +88,130 @@ out:
>                  resp.a7 & mask);
> }
> 
> +static int32_t ffa_msg_send2_vm(uint16_t dst_id, const void *src_buf,
> +                                struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx *src_msg)
> +{
> +    struct domain *dst_d;
> +    struct ffa_ctx *dst_ctx;
> +    struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx *dst_msg;
> +    int err;
> +    int32_t ret;
> +
> +    if ( dst_id == 0 )
> +        /* FF-A ID 0 is the hypervisor, this is not valid */
> +        return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
> +
> +    /* This is also checking that dest is not src */
> +    err = rcu_lock_live_remote_domain_by_id(dst_id - 1, &dst_d);
> +    if ( err )
> +        return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
> +
> +    if ( dst_d->arch.tee == NULL )
> +    {
> +        ret = FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
> +        goto out_unlock;
> +    }
> +
> +    dst_ctx = dst_d->arch.tee;
> +    if ( !dst_ctx->guest_vers )
> +    {
> +        ret = FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
> +        goto out_unlock;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* This also checks that destination has set a Rx buffer */
> +    ret = ffa_rx_acquire(dst_d);
> +    if ( ret )
> +        goto out_unlock;
> +
> +    /* we need to have enough space in the destination buffer */
> +    if ( (dst_ctx->page_count * FFA_PAGE_SIZE -
> +          sizeof(struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx)) < src_msg->msg_size )
> +    {
> +        ret = FFA_RET_NO_MEMORY;
> +        ffa_rx_release(dst_d);
> +        goto out_unlock;
> +    }
> +
> +    dst_msg = dst_ctx->rx;
> +
> +    /* prepare destination header */
> +    dst_msg->flags = 0;
> +    dst_msg->reserved = 0;
> +    dst_msg->msg_offset = sizeof(struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx);
> +    dst_msg->send_recv_id = src_msg->send_recv_id;
> +    dst_msg->msg_size = src_msg->msg_size;
> +
> +    memcpy(dst_ctx->rx + sizeof(struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx),
> +           src_buf + src_msg->msg_offset, src_msg->msg_size);
> +
> +    /* receiver rx buffer will be released by the receiver*/
> +
> +out_unlock:
> +    rcu_unlock_domain(dst_d);
> +    if ( !ret )
> +        ffa_raise_rx_buffer_full(dst_d);
> +
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +
> int32_t ffa_handle_msg_send2(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> {
>     struct domain *src_d = current->domain;
>     struct ffa_ctx *src_ctx = src_d->arch.tee;
> -    const struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx *src_msg;
> +    struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx src_msg;
>     uint16_t dst_id, src_id;
>     int32_t ret;
> 
> -    if ( !ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_MSG_SEND2) )
> -        return FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> +    BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx) >= FFA_PAGE_SIZE);
> 
>     if ( !spin_trylock(&src_ctx->tx_lock) )
>         return FFA_RET_BUSY;
> 
> -    src_msg = src_ctx->tx;
> -    src_id = src_msg->send_recv_id >> 16;
> -    dst_id = src_msg->send_recv_id & GENMASK(15,0);
> +    /* create a copy of the message header */
> +    memcpy(&src_msg, src_ctx->tx, sizeof(src_msg));
> 
> -    if ( src_id != ffa_get_vm_id(src_d) || !FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(dst_id) )
> +    src_id = src_msg.send_recv_id >> 16;
> +    dst_id = src_msg.send_recv_id & GENMASK(15,0);
> +
> +    if ( src_id != ffa_get_vm_id(src_d) )
>     {
>         ret = FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
> -        goto out_unlock_tx;
> +        goto out;
>     }
> 
>     /* check source message fits in buffer */
> -    if ( src_ctx->page_count * FFA_PAGE_SIZE <
> -         src_msg->msg_offset + src_msg->msg_size ||
> -         src_msg->msg_offset < sizeof(struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx) )
> +    if ( src_msg.msg_offset < sizeof(struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx) ||
> +            src_msg.msg_size == 0 ||
> +            src_msg.msg_offset > src_ctx->page_count * FFA_PAGE_SIZE ||
> +            src_msg.msg_size > (src_ctx->page_count * FFA_PAGE_SIZE -
> +                                src_msg.msg_offset) )
>     {
>         ret = FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
> -        goto out_unlock_tx;
> +        goto out;
>     }
> 
> -    ret = ffa_simple_call(FFA_MSG_SEND2,
> -                          ((uint32_t)ffa_get_vm_id(src_d)) << 16, 0, 0, 0);
> +    if ( FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(dst_id) )
> +    {
> +        /* Message for a secure partition */
> +        if ( !ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_MSG_SEND2) )
> +        {
> +            ret = FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> +            goto out;
> +        }
> +
> +        ret = ffa_simple_call(FFA_MSG_SEND2,
> +                              ((uint32_t)ffa_get_vm_id(src_d)) << 16, 0, 0, 
> 0);
> +    }
> +    else if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM) )
> +    {
> +        /* Message for a VM */
> +        ret = ffa_msg_send2_vm(dst_id, src_ctx->tx, &src_msg);
> +    }
> +    else
> +        ret = FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
> 
> -out_unlock_tx:
> +out:
>     spin_unlock(&src_ctx->tx_lock);
>     return ret;
> }
> -- 
> 2.47.1
> 
> 




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.