[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] x86/xen/msr: Fix uninitialized symbol 'err'
- To: Jürgen Groß <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Xin Li <xin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 09:23:14 -0700
- Autocrypt: addr=xin@xxxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDNBGUPz1cBDACS/9yOJGojBFPxFt0OfTWuMl0uSgpwk37uRrFPTTLw4BaxhlFL0bjs6q+0 2OfG34R+a0ZCuj5c9vggUMoOLdDyA7yPVAJU0OX6lqpg6z/kyQg3t4jvajG6aCgwSDx5Kzg5 Rj3AXl8k2wb0jdqRB4RvaOPFiHNGgXCs5Pkux/qr0laeFIpzMKMootGa4kfURgPhRzUaM1vy bsMsL8vpJtGUmitrSqe5dVNBH00whLtPFM7IbzKURPUOkRRiusFAsw0a1ztCgoFczq6VfAVu raTye0L/VXwZd+aGi401V2tLsAHxxckRi9p3mc0jExPc60joK+aZPy6amwSCy5kAJ/AboYtY VmKIGKx1yx8POy6m+1lZ8C0q9b8eJ8kWPAR78PgT37FQWKYS1uAroG2wLdK7FiIEpPhCD+zH wlslo2ETbdKjrLIPNehQCOWrT32k8vFNEMLP5G/mmjfNj5sEf3IOKgMTMVl9AFjsINLHcxEQ 6T8nGbX/n3msP6A36FDfdSEAEQEAAc0WWGluIExpIDx4aW5Aenl0b3IuY29tPsLBDQQTAQgA NxYhBIUq/WFSDTiOvUIqv2u9DlcdrjdRBQJlD89XBQkFo5qAAhsDBAsJCAcFFQgJCgsFFgID AQAACgkQa70OVx2uN1HUpgv/cM2fsFCQodLArMTX5nt9yqAWgA5t1srri6EgS8W3F+3Kitge tYTBKu6j5BXuXaX3vyfCm+zajDJN77JHuYnpcKKr13VcZi1Swv6Jx1u0II8DOmoDYLb1Q2ZW v83W55fOWJ2g72x/UjVJBQ0sVjAngazU3ckc0TeNQlkcpSVGa/qBIHLfZraWtdrNAQT4A1fa sWGuJrChBFhtKbYXbUCu9AoYmmbQnsx2EWoJy3h7OjtfFapJbPZql+no5AJ3Mk9eE5oWyLH+ QWqtOeJM7kKvn/dBudokFSNhDUw06e7EoVPSJyUIMbYtUO7g2+Atu44G/EPP0yV0J4lRO6EA wYRXff7+I1jIWEHpj5EFVYO6SmBg7zF2illHEW31JAPtdDLDHYcZDfS41caEKOQIPsdzQkaQ oW2hchcjcMPAfyhhRzUpVHLPxLCetP8vrVhTvnaZUo0xaVYb3+wjP+D5j/3+hwblu2agPsaE vgVbZ8Fx3TUxUPCAdr/p73DGg57oHjgezsDNBGUPz1gBDAD4Mg7hMFRQqlzotcNSxatlAQNL MadLfUTFz8wUUa21LPLrHBkUwm8RujehJrzcVbPYwPXIO0uyL/F///CogMNx7Iwo6by43KOy g89wVFhyy237EY76j1lVfLzcMYmjBoTH95fJC/lVb5Whxil6KjSN/R/y3jfG1dPXfwAuZ/4N cMoOslWkfZKJeEut5aZTRepKKF54T5r49H9F7OFLyxrC/uI9UDttWqMxcWyCkHh0v1Di8176 jjYRNTrGEfYfGxSp+3jYL3PoNceIMkqM9haXjjGl0W1B4BidK1LVYBNov0rTEzyr0a1riUrp Qk+6z/LHxCM9lFFXnqH7KWeToTOPQebD2B/Ah5CZlft41i8L6LOF/LCuDBuYlu/fI2nuCc8d m4wwtkou1Y/kIwbEsE/6RQwRXUZhzO6llfoN96Fczr/RwvPIK5SVMixqWq4QGFAyK0m/1ap4 bhIRrdCLVQcgU4glo17vqfEaRcTW5SgX+pGs4KIPPBE5J/ABD6pBnUUAEQEAAcLA/AQYAQgA JhYhBIUq/WFSDTiOvUIqv2u9DlcdrjdRBQJlD89ZBQkFo5qAAhsMAAoJEGu9DlcdrjdR4C0L /RcjolEjoZW8VsyxWtXazQPnaRvzZ4vhmGOsCPr2BPtMlSwDzTlri8BBG1/3t/DNK4JLuwEj OAIE3fkkm+UG4Kjud6aNeraDI52DRVCSx6xff3bjmJsJJMb12mWglN6LjdF6K+PE+OTJUh2F dOhslN5C2kgl0dvUuevwMgQF3IljLmi/6APKYJHjkJpu1E6luZec/lRbetHuNFtbh3xgFIJx 2RpgVDP4xB3f8r0I+y6ua+p7fgOjDLyoFjubRGed0Be45JJQEn7A3CSb6Xu7NYobnxfkwAGZ Q81a2XtvNS7Aj6NWVoOQB5KbM4yosO5+Me1V1SkX2jlnn26JPEvbV3KRFcwV5RnDxm4OQTSk PYbAkjBbm+tuJ/Sm+5Yp5T/BnKz21FoCS8uvTiziHj2H7Cuekn6F8EYhegONm+RVg3vikOpn gao85i4HwQTK9/D1wgJIQkdwWXVMZ6q/OALaBp82vQ2U9sjTyFXgDjglgh00VRAHP7u1Rcu4 l75w1xInsg==
- Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, rafael@xxxxxxxxxx, lenb@xxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sat, 17 May 2025 16:24:02 +0000
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.zytor.com 54HGNEBu917019
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 5/16/2025 6:42 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 15.05.25 20:11, Xin Li wrote:
On 5/15/2025 8:29 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Xin Li (Intel) <xin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
xen_read_msr_safe() currently passes an uninitialized argument err to
xen_do_read_msr(). But as xen_do_read_msr() may not set the argument,
xen_read_msr_safe() could return err with an unpredictable value.
To ensure correctness, initialize err to 0 (representing success)
in xen_read_msr_safe().
Because xen_read_msr_safe() is essentially a wrapper of
xen_do_read_msr(),
the latter should be responsible for initializing the value of *err
to 0.
Thus initialize *err to 0 in xen_do_read_msr().
Fixes: 502ad6e5a619 ("x86/msr: Change the function type of
native_read_msr_safe()")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/aBxNI_Q0-
MhtBSZG@stanley.mountain/
Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
index 3be38350f044..01f1d441347e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
@@ -1091,6 +1091,9 @@ static u64 xen_do_read_msr(u32 msr, int *err)
{
u64 val = 0; /* Avoid uninitialized value for safe variant. */
+ if (err)
+ *err = 0;
+
if (pmu_msr_chk_emulated(msr, &val, true))
return val;
@@ -1162,7 +1165,7 @@ static void xen_do_write_msr(u32 msr, u64 val,
int *err)
static int xen_read_msr_safe(u32 msr, u64 *val)
{
- int err;
+ int err = 0;
*val = xen_do_read_msr(msr, &err);
return err;
So why not initialize 'err' with 0 in both callers, xen_read_msr_safe()
and xen_read_msr(), and avoid all the initialization trouble in
xen_do_read_msr()?
Yeah, I should make the change in xen_read_msr() too.
However xen_do_read_msr() should be implemented in a defensive way to
set *err properly as it's part of its return value. Actually it was so,
but one of my previous cleanup patch removed it because err is no longer
passed to pmu_msr_chk_emulated().
xen_do_read_msr() is usable only in enlighten_pv.c as it is static.
So I'd prefer to drop setting err to 0 in xen_do_read_msr() initially
and to set err to 0 in all callers.
Okay, I will send v1A to address this comment then.
Thanks!
Xin
Juergen
|