|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] vpci/header: Move emulating cap list logic into new function
Hi,
On 2025/4/21 14:18, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> No functional changes.
> Follow-on changes will benifit from this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> cc: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2->v3 changes:
> new patch.
Are there any other changes that need to be made to this series of patches?
If have, I can modify them in my upcoming new version.
>
> Best regards,
> Jiqian Chen.
> ---
> xen/drivers/vpci/header.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> index ef6c965c081c..3e9b44454b43 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> @@ -745,6 +745,75 @@ static int bar_add_rangeset(const struct pci_dev *pdev,
> struct vpci_bar *bar,
> return !bar->mem ? -ENOMEM : 0;
> }
>
> +static int vpci_init_capability_list(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + int rc;
> + bool mask_cap_list = false;
> +
> + if ( !is_hardware_domain(pdev->domain) &&
> + pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, PCI_STATUS) & PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST )
> + {
> + /* Only expose capabilities to the guest that vPCI can handle. */
> + unsigned int next, ttl = 48;
> + static const unsigned int supported_caps[] = {
> + PCI_CAP_ID_MSI,
> + PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX,
> + };
> +
> + next = pci_find_next_cap_ttl(pdev->sbdf, PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST,
> + supported_caps,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(supported_caps), &ttl);
> +
> + rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_read_val, NULL,
> + PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST, 1,
> + (void *)(uintptr_t)next);
> + if ( rc )
> + return rc;
> +
> + next &= ~3;
> +
> + if ( !next )
> + /*
> + * If we don't have any supported capabilities to expose to the
> + * guest, mask the PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST bit in the status
> + * register.
> + */
> + mask_cap_list = true;
> +
> + while ( next && ttl )
> + {
> + unsigned int pos = next;
> +
> + next = pci_find_next_cap_ttl(pdev->sbdf,
> + pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT,
> + supported_caps,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(supported_caps), &ttl);
> +
> + rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_hw_read8, NULL,
> + pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_ID, 1, NULL);
> + if ( rc )
> + return rc;
> +
> + rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_read_val, NULL,
> + pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT, 1,
> + (void *)(uintptr_t)next);
> + if ( rc )
> + return rc;
> +
> + next &= ~3;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Utilize rsvdp_mask to hide PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST from the guest. */
> + return vpci_add_register_mask(pdev->vpci, vpci_hw_read16,
> vpci_hw_write16,
> + PCI_STATUS, 2, NULL,
> + PCI_STATUS_RO_MASK &
> + ~(mask_cap_list ? PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST :
> 0),
> + PCI_STATUS_RW1C_MASK,
> + mask_cap_list ? PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST : 0,
> + PCI_STATUS_RSVDZ_MASK);
> +}
> +
> static int cf_check init_header(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> uint16_t cmd;
> @@ -753,7 +822,6 @@ static int cf_check init_header(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> struct vpci_header *header = &pdev->vpci->header;
> struct vpci_bar *bars = header->bars;
> int rc;
> - bool mask_cap_list = false;
> bool is_hwdom = is_hardware_domain(pdev->domain);
>
> ASSERT(rw_is_write_locked(&pdev->domain->pci_lock));
> @@ -794,61 +862,12 @@ static int cf_check init_header(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> if ( rc )
> return rc;
>
> + rc = vpci_init_capability_list(pdev);
> + if ( rc )
> + return rc;
> +
> if ( !is_hwdom )
> {
> - if ( pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, PCI_STATUS) & PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST )
> - {
> - /* Only expose capabilities to the guest that vPCI can handle. */
> - unsigned int next, ttl = 48;
> - static const unsigned int supported_caps[] = {
> - PCI_CAP_ID_MSI,
> - PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX,
> - };
> -
> - next = pci_find_next_cap_ttl(pdev->sbdf, PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST,
> - supported_caps,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(supported_caps), &ttl);
> -
> - rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_read_val, NULL,
> - PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST, 1,
> - (void *)(uintptr_t)next);
> - if ( rc )
> - return rc;
> -
> - next &= ~3;
> -
> - if ( !next )
> - /*
> - * If we don't have any supported capabilities to expose to
> the
> - * guest, mask the PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST bit in the status
> - * register.
> - */
> - mask_cap_list = true;
> -
> - while ( next && ttl )
> - {
> - unsigned int pos = next;
> -
> - next = pci_find_next_cap_ttl(pdev->sbdf,
> - pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT,
> - supported_caps,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(supported_caps),
> &ttl);
> -
> - rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_hw_read8, NULL,
> - pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_ID, 1, NULL);
> - if ( rc )
> - return rc;
> -
> - rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_read_val, NULL,
> - pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT, 1,
> - (void *)(uintptr_t)next);
> - if ( rc )
> - return rc;
> -
> - next &= ~3;
> - }
> - }
> -
> /* Extended capabilities read as zero, write ignore */
> rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_read_val, NULL, 0x100, 4,
> (void *)0);
> @@ -856,17 +875,6 @@ static int cf_check init_header(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> return rc;
> }
>
> - /* Utilize rsvdp_mask to hide PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST from the guest. */
> - rc = vpci_add_register_mask(pdev->vpci, vpci_hw_read16, vpci_hw_write16,
> - PCI_STATUS, 2, NULL,
> - PCI_STATUS_RO_MASK &
> - ~(mask_cap_list ? PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST :
> 0),
> - PCI_STATUS_RW1C_MASK,
> - mask_cap_list ? PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST : 0,
> - PCI_STATUS_RSVDZ_MASK);
> - if ( rc )
> - return rc;
> -
> if ( pdev->ignore_bars )
> return 0;
>
--
Best regards,
Jiqian Chen.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |