[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] xen/console: introduce console_{get,put}_domain()
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 18.02.2025 09:31, dmkhn@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > @@ -546,31 +555,23 @@ static void __serial_rx(char c) > > * getting stuck. > > */ > > send_global_virq(VIRQ_CONSOLE); > > - break; > > - > > + } > > #ifdef CONFIG_SBSA_VUART_CONSOLE > > - default: > > - { > > - struct domain *d = rcu_lock_domain_by_id(console_rx - 1); > > - > > - if ( d ) > > - { > > - int rc = vpl011_rx_char_xen(d, c); > > - if ( rc ) > > - guest_printk(d, XENLOG_G_WARNING > > - "failed to process console input: %d\n", > > rc); > > - rcu_unlock_domain(d); > > - } > > - > > - break; > > - } > > + else > > + /* Deliver input to the emulated UART. */ > > + rc = vpl011_rx_char_xen(d, c); > > #endif > > - } > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86 > > if ( pv_shim && pv_console ) > > consoled_guest_tx(c); > > #endif > > + > > + if ( rc ) > > + guest_printk(d, XENLOG_G_WARNING > > + "failed to process console input: %d\n", rc); > > Wouldn't this better live ahead of the four shim related lines? > > Also please correct the log level specifier here. I realize you only move > what was there before, but I consider i bad practice to move buggy code. > gprintk() already prepends XENLOG_GUEST, so instead of XENLOG_G_WARNING > is should just be XENLOG_WARNING. (Line wrapping is also odd here, at > least according to my taste. But since that's not written down anywhere, > I wouldn't insist on adjusting that as well.) > > With both adjustments (provided you agree, of course) > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > Given they're reasonably simple to make, I could once again offer to > adjust while committing (provided an Arm ack also arrives). Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |