[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] xen: introduce xen_vring_use_dma
- To: <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Amneesh Singh <a-singh21@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:29:10 +0530
- Cc: <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>, <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>, <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>, <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:59:46 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
Hi Stefano,
First off, apologies for bumping this dead thread.
I came across this patch signed off by you recently
https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/commit/72cb5514953be3aa2ac00c57c9eaa100ecc67176
and was wondering if a patch replacing xen_domain() with xen_pv_domain() in
vring_use_dma_api() can be sent upstream? If not, is there a reason why?
Regards
Amneesh
|
