Re: [PATCH v3 12/12] xen/arm: List static shared memory regions as /memory nodes

[Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>]

On 22/04/2024 10:07, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Michal,
> 
>>> +    for ( cells = reg, i = 0; cells < reg + nr_cells; i++, cells += 
>>> reg_size )
>>> +    {
>>> +        u64 start = dt_read_number(cells, addrcells);
>> We should no longer use Linux derived types like u64. Use uint64_t.
>>
>>> +        u64 size = dt_read_number(cells + addrcells, sizecells);
>>> +
>>> +        dt_dprintk("  Bank %d: %#"PRIx64"->%#"PRIx64"\n",
>>> +                   i, start, start + size);
>> i is unsigned so the correct format specifier should be %u
> 
> Right, should have been more careful when copying the code from above
> 
>>>
>>> +void __init shm_mem_node_fill_reg_range(const struct kernel_info *kinfo,
>>> +                                        __be32 *reg, int *nr_cells,
>>> +                                        int addrcells, int sizecells)
>>> +{
>>> +    const struct membanks *mem = &kinfo->shm_mem.common;
>>> +    unsigned int i;
>>> +    __be32 *cells;
>>> +
>>> +    BUG_ON(!nr_cells || !reg);
>>> +
>>> +    cells = &reg[*nr_cells];
>>> +    for ( i = 0; i < mem->nr_banks; i++ )
>>> +    {
>>> +        u64 start = mem->bank[i].start;
>> ditto
> 
> Will fix, here paddr_t should be ok isn’t it?
yes

> 
>>
>> Rest LGTM:
>> Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks, I will send the next one shortly.
I don't think there is a need to respin the whole series just for these fixes.
You should wait for the committers opinion.

~Michal