|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 21/34] xen/riscv: introduce p2m.h
On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 17:11 -0600, Shawn Anastasio wrote:
> Hi Oleksii,
>
> On 12/22/23 9:13 AM, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in V3:
> > - add SPDX
> > - drop unneeded for now p2m types.
> > - return false in all functions implemented with BUG() inside.
> > - update the commit message
> > ---
> > Changes in V2:
> > - Nothing changed. Only rebase.
> > ---
> > xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h | 3 +-
> > xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/p2m.h | 102
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/p2m.h
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h
> > b/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h
> > index 25ba054668..3bc05b7c05 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h
> > +++ b/xen/arch/ppc/include/asm/p2m.h
> > @@ -50,8 +50,7 @@ static inline void memory_type_changed(struct
> > domain *d)
> > static inline int guest_physmap_mark_populate_on_demand(struct
> > domain *d, unsigned long gfn,
> > unsigned
> > int order)
> > {
> > - BUG_ON("unimplemented");
> > - return 1;
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > }
> >
>
> Was this change included by mistake? I'm not sure why this patch
> should
> touch PPC's p2m.h.
I think you are right. It's mistake. RISC-V has the similar p2m.h so I
faulty changed PPC version too.
Thanks.
~ Oleksii
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |