|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 0/8] limit passing around of cpu_user_regs
On 11/01/2024 08:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>
> Unlike (synchronous) exception handlers, interrupt handlers don't normally
> have a need to know the outer context's register state. Similarly, the vast
> majority of key handlers has no need for such.
>
> 1: keyhandler: don't pass cpu_user_regs around
> 2: IRQ: generalize [gs]et_irq_regs()
> 3: serial: drop serial_rx_fn's regs parameter
> 4: PV-shim: drop pv_console_rx()'s regs parameter
> 5: serial: drop serial_[rt]x_interrupt()'s regs parameter
> 6: IRQ: drop regs parameter from handler functions
FYI, I did a build test on Arm and there were 2 build errors. Fix below:
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/ipmmu-vmsa.c
b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/ipmmu-vmsa.c
index b5c84c51a20a..da011413c5c0 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/ipmmu-vmsa.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/ipmmu-vmsa.c
@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ static void ipmmu_domain_irq(struct ipmmu_vmsa_domain
*domain)
domain->d, status, iova);
}
-static void ipmmu_irq(int irq, void *dev, struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
+static void ipmmu_irq(int irq, void *dev)
{
struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *mmu = dev;
unsigned int i;
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c
b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c
index f820c5500e08..c3ac6d17d1c8 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c
@@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_combined_irq_handler(int irq, void
*dev)
{
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev;
- arm_smmu_gerror_handler(irq, dev, regs);
+ arm_smmu_gerror_handler(irq, dev);
tasklet_schedule(&(smmu->combined_irq_tasklet));
}
> 7: x86/vPMU: drop regs parameter from interrupt functions
> 8: x86/APIC: drop regs parameter from direct vector handler functions
>
> Jan
>
~Michal
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |