[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] xen: ifdef inclusion of <asm/grant_table.h> in <xen/grant_table.h>
On Mon, 2023-12-04 at 11:39 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 04.12.2023 11:34, Oleksii wrote: > > If you ( or anyone else ) don't mind, I'll update the patch with an > > introduction of HAS_GRANT_TABLE. > > I won't NAK such a patch, but unless convincing arguments appear I > also > won't ACK it. I am going to disable GRANT_TABLE config for RISC-V ( and PPC? ) by providing a separate YAML file ( riscv-fixed-randconfig.yaml ) with the following content: .riscv-fixed-randconfig: variables: EXTRA_FIXED_RANDCONFIG: CONFIG_COVERAGE=n CONFIG_GRANT_TABLE=n CONFIG_MEM_ACCESS=n # this I'll add in the next patch where asm- geneic for mem_access.h is introduced And then for riscv*randconfig jobs do the following: archlinux-current-gcc-riscv64-randconfig: extends: - .gcc-riscv64-cross-build variables: CONTAINER: archlinux:current-riscv64 KBUILD_DEFCONFIG: tiny64_defconfig RANDCONFIG: y EXTRA_FIXED_RANDCONFIG: !reference [.riscv-fixed-randconfig, variables, EXTRA_FIXED_RANDCONFIG] For RISC-V, I prefer having a separate file for all the EXTRA_FIXED_RANDCONFIG because in another patch series [1], I'll introduce a large number of disabled configs for randconfig. For PPC, I don't think it's necessary to introduce a separate YAML file for EXTRA_FIXED_RANDCONFIG. For the time being, it is only necessary to disable two configs: CONFIG_GRANT_TABLE and CONFIG_MEM_ACCESS (in the next patch of this series). If this solution is acceptable to you, can I retain your 'Suggested- by'?" [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/b4e85f8f58787b4d179022973ce25673d6b56e36.1700761381.git.oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx/ ~ Oleksii
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |