[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 43/48] drm/ttm: introduce pool_shrink_rwsem
- To: daniel@xxxxxxxx
- From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 10:59:34 +0800
- Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, tkhai@xxxxx, vbabka@xxxxxxx, roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx, djwong@xxxxxxxxxx, brauner@xxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, steven.price@xxxxxxx, cel@xxxxxxxxxx, senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx, yujie.liu@xxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, muchun.song@xxxxxxxxx, simon.horman@xxxxxxxxxxxx, dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-erofs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 03:00:15 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
Hi Daniel,
On 2023/8/22 21:56, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 07:09:31PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
Currently, the synchronize_shrinkers() is only used by TTM pool. It only
requires that no shrinkers run in parallel.
After we use RCU+refcount method to implement the lockless slab shrink,
we can not use shrinker_rwsem or synchronize_rcu() to guarantee that all
shrinker invocations have seen an update before freeing memory.
So we introduce a new pool_shrink_rwsem to implement a private
synchronize_shrinkers(), so as to achieve the same purpose.
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On the 5 drm patches (I counted 2 ttm and 3 drivers) for merging through
some other tree (since I'm assuming that's how this will land):
Yeah, there are 5 drm patches: PATCH v4 07/48 23/48 24/48 25/48 43/48.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
Thanks for your review!
Qi
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/shrinker.h | 2 --
mm/shrinker.c | 15 ---------------
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
index c9c9618c0dce..38b4c280725c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ static struct ttm_pool_type global_dma32_uncached[MAX_ORDER +
1];
static spinlock_t shrinker_lock;
static struct list_head shrinker_list;
static struct shrinker *mm_shrinker;
+static DECLARE_RWSEM(pool_shrink_rwsem);
/* Allocate pages of size 1 << order with the given gfp_flags */
static struct page *ttm_pool_alloc_page(struct ttm_pool *pool, gfp_t
gfp_flags,
@@ -317,6 +318,7 @@ static unsigned int ttm_pool_shrink(void)
unsigned int num_pages;
struct page *p;
+ down_read(&pool_shrink_rwsem);
spin_lock(&shrinker_lock);
pt = list_first_entry(&shrinker_list, typeof(*pt), shrinker_list);
list_move_tail(&pt->shrinker_list, &shrinker_list);
@@ -329,6 +331,7 @@ static unsigned int ttm_pool_shrink(void)
} else {
num_pages = 0;
}
+ up_read(&pool_shrink_rwsem);
return num_pages;
}
@@ -572,6 +575,18 @@ void ttm_pool_init(struct ttm_pool *pool, struct device
*dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_pool_init);
+/**
+ * synchronize_shrinkers - Wait for all running shrinkers to complete.
+ *
+ * This is useful to guarantee that all shrinker invocations have seen an
+ * update, before freeing memory, similar to rcu.
+ */
+static void synchronize_shrinkers(void)
+{
+ down_write(&pool_shrink_rwsem);
+ up_write(&pool_shrink_rwsem);
+}
+
/**
* ttm_pool_fini - Cleanup a pool
*
diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index c55c07c3f0cb..025c8070dd86 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -103,8 +103,6 @@ struct shrinker *shrinker_alloc(unsigned int flags, const
char *fmt, ...);
void shrinker_register(struct shrinker *shrinker);
void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker);
-extern void synchronize_shrinkers(void);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG
extern int __printf(2, 3) shrinker_debugfs_rename(struct shrinker *shrinker,
const char *fmt, ...);
diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
index 3ab301ff122d..a27779ed3798 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker.c
@@ -650,18 +650,3 @@ void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
kfree(shrinker);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shrinker_free);
-
-/**
- * synchronize_shrinkers - Wait for all running shrinkers to complete.
- *
- * This is equivalent to calling unregister_shrink() and register_shrinker(),
- * but atomically and with less overhead. This is useful to guarantee that all
- * shrinker invocations have seen an update, before freeing memory, similar to
- * rcu.
- */
-void synchronize_shrinkers(void)
-{
- down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
- up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_shrinkers);
--
2.30.2
|