[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] xen/arm64: Rework the memory layout
On 30/01/2023 09:08, Michal Orzel wrote: Hi Julien, Hi Michal, On 27/01/2023 20:55, Julien Grall wrote:From: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx> Xen is currently not fully compliant with the Arm Arm because it will switch the TTBR with the MMU on. In order to be compliant, we need to disable the MMU before switching the TTBR. The implication is the page-tables should contain an identity mapping of the code switching the TTBR. In most of the case we expect Xen to be loaded in low memory. I am aware of one platform (i.e AMD Seattle) where the memory start above 512GB. To give us some slack, consider that Xen may be loaded in the first 2TB of the physical address space. The memory layout is reshuffled to keep the first four slots of the zeroeth level free. Xen will now be loaded at (2TB + 2MB). This requires a slight tweak of the boot code because XEN_VIRT_START cannot be used as an immediate. This reshuffle will make trivial to create a 1:1 mapping when Xen is loaded below 2TB. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Luca Fancellu <luca.fancellu@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx> --- Changes in v5: - We are reserving 4 slots rather than 2. - Fix the addresses in the layout comment. - Fix the size of the region in the layout comment - Add Luca's tested-by (the reviewed-by was not added because of the changes requested by Michal - Add Michal's reviewed-by Changes in v4: - Correct the documentation - The start address is 2TB, so slot0 is 4 not 2. Changes in v2: - Reword the commit message - Load Xen at 2TB + 2MB - Update the documentation to reflect the new layout --- xen/arch/arm/arm64/head.S | 3 ++- xen/arch/arm/include/asm/config.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++---------- xen/arch/arm/mm.c | 11 +++++----- 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/arm64/head.S b/xen/arch/arm/arm64/head.S index 4a3f87117c83..663f5813b12e 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/arm64/head.S +++ b/xen/arch/arm/arm64/head.S @@ -607,7 +607,8 @@ create_page_tables: * need an additional 1:1 mapping, the virtual mapping will * suffice. */ - cmp x19, #XEN_VIRT_START + ldr x0, =XEN_VIRT_START + cmp x19, x0 bne 1f ret 1: diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/config.h b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/config.h index 5df0e4c4959b..e388462c23d1 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/config.h +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/config.h @@ -72,16 +72,13 @@ #include <xen/page-size.h> /* - * Common ARM32 and ARM64 layout: + * ARM32 layout: * 0 - 2M Unmapped * 2M - 4M Xen text, data, bss * 4M - 6M Fixmap: special-purpose 4K mapping slots * 6M - 10M Early boot mapping of FDT * 10M - 12M Livepatch vmap (if compiled in) * - * ARM32 layout: - * 0 - 12M <COMMON> - * * 32M - 128M Frametable: 32 bytes per page for 12GB of RAM * 256M - 1G VMAP: ioremap and early_ioremap use this virtual address * space @@ -90,14 +87,23 @@ * 2G - 4G Domheap: on-demand-mapped * * ARM64 layout: - * 0x0000000000000000 - 0x0000007fffffffff (512GB, L0 slot [0]) - * 0 - 12M <COMMON> + * 0x0000000000000000 - 0x000001ffffffffff (2TB, L0 slots [0..3]) + * + * Reserved to identity map Xen + * + * 0x0000020000000000 - 0x0000027fffffffff (512GB, L0 slot [4] + * (Relative offsets) + * 0 - 2M Unmapped + * 2M - 4M Xen text, data, bss + * 4M - 6M Fixmap: special-purpose 4K mapping slots + * 6M - 10M Early boot mapping of FDT + * 10M - 12M Livepatch vmap (if compiled in) * * 1G - 2G VMAP: ioremap and early_ioremap * * 32G - 64G Frametable: 56 bytes per page for 2TB of RAM * - * 0x0000008000000000 - 0x00007fffffffffff (127.5TB, L0 slots [1..255]) + * 0x0000028000000000 - 0x00007fffffffffff (125TB, L0 slots [5..255]) * Unused * * 0x0000800000000000 - 0x000084ffffffffff (5TB, L0 slots [256..265]) @@ -107,7 +113,17 @@ * Unused */ +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32 #define XEN_VIRT_START _AT(vaddr_t, MB(2)) +#else + +#define SLOT0_ENTRY_BITS 39 +#define SLOT0(slot) (_AT(vaddr_t,slot) << SLOT0_ENTRY_BITS) +#define SLOT0_ENTRY_SIZE SLOT0(1) + +#define XEN_VIRT_START (SLOT0(4) + _AT(vaddr_t, MB(2))) +#endif + #define XEN_VIRT_SIZE _AT(vaddr_t, MB(2)) #define FIXMAP_VIRT_START (XEN_VIRT_START + XEN_VIRT_SIZE) @@ -163,10 +179,6 @@ #else /* ARM_64 */ -#define SLOT0_ENTRY_BITS 39 -#define SLOT0(slot) (_AT(vaddr_t,slot) << SLOT0_ENTRY_BITS) -#define SLOT0_ENTRY_SIZE SLOT0(1) - #define VMAP_VIRT_START GB(1) #define VMAP_VIRT_SIZE GB(1) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c index f758cad545fa..0b0edf28d57a 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static void __init __maybe_unused build_assertions(void) #endif /* Page table structure constraints */ #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64 - BUILD_BUG_ON(zeroeth_table_offset(XEN_VIRT_START)); + BUILD_BUG_ON(zeroeth_table_offset(XEN_VIRT_START) < 2);I haven't spotted this before but this should be < 4. Good catch! I am planning to handle it on commit unless there is more to fix in this patch. Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |