[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 17/22] x86/setup: vmap heap nodes when they are outside the direct map
On Fri, 16 Dec 2022, Julien Grall wrote: > From: Hongyan Xia <hongyxia@xxxxxxxxxx> > > When we do not have a direct map, archs_mfn_in_direct_map() will always > return false, thus init_node_heap() will allocate xenheap pages from an > existing node for the metadata of a new node. This means that the > metadata of a new node is in a different node, slowing down heap > allocation. > > Since we now have early vmap, vmap the metadata locally in the new node. > > Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xia <hongyxia@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx> > > ---- > > Changes from Hongyan's version: > * arch_mfn_in_direct_map() was renamed to > arch_mfns_in_direct_map() > * Use vmap_contig_pages() rather than __vmap(...). > * Add missing include (xen/vmap.h) so it compiles on Arm > --- > xen/common/page_alloc.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/common/page_alloc.c b/xen/common/page_alloc.c > index 0c4af5a71407..581c15d74dfb 100644 > --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c > +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c > @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ > #include <xen/sched.h> > #include <xen/softirq.h> > #include <xen/spinlock.h> > +#include <xen/vmap.h> > > #include <asm/flushtlb.h> > #include <asm/numa.h> > @@ -597,22 +598,43 @@ static unsigned long init_node_heap(int node, unsigned > long mfn, > needed = 0; > } > else if ( *use_tail && nr >= needed && > - arch_mfns_in_directmap(mfn + nr - needed, needed) && > (!xenheap_bits || > !((mfn + nr - 1) >> (xenheap_bits - PAGE_SHIFT))) ) > { > - _heap[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn + nr - needed); > - avail[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn + nr - 1) + > - PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(**avail) * NR_ZONES; > - } > - else if ( nr >= needed && > - arch_mfns_in_directmap(mfn, needed) && > + if ( arch_mfns_in_directmap(mfn + nr - needed, needed) ) > + { > + _heap[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn + nr - needed); > + avail[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn + nr - 1) + > + PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(**avail) * NR_ZONES; > + } > + else > + { > + mfn_t needed_start = _mfn(mfn + nr - needed); > + > + _heap[node] = vmap_contig_pages(needed_start, needed); > + BUG_ON(!_heap[node]); I see a BUG_ON here but init_node_heap is not __init. Asking because BUG_ON is only a good idea during init time. Should init_node_heap be __init (not necessarely in this patch, but still)? > + avail[node] = (void *)(_heap[node]) + (needed << PAGE_SHIFT) - > + sizeof(**avail) * NR_ZONES; > + } > + } else if ( nr >= needed && > (!xenheap_bits || > !((mfn + needed - 1) >> (xenheap_bits - PAGE_SHIFT))) ) > { > - _heap[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn); > - avail[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn + needed - 1) + > - PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(**avail) * NR_ZONES; > + if ( arch_mfns_in_directmap(mfn, needed) ) > + { > + _heap[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn); > + avail[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn + needed - 1) + > + PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(**avail) * NR_ZONES; > + } > + else > + { > + mfn_t needed_start = _mfn(mfn); > + > + _heap[node] = vmap_contig_pages(needed_start, needed); > + BUG_ON(!_heap[node]); > + avail[node] = (void *)(_heap[node]) + (needed << PAGE_SHIFT) - > + sizeof(**avail) * NR_ZONES; > + } > *use_tail = false; > } > else if ( get_order_from_bytes(sizeof(**_heap)) == > -- > 2.38.1 >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |