[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 0/6] Resolve TYPE_PIIX3_XEN_DEVICE
On 1/2/23 4:34 PM, Bernhard Beschow wrote: > This series first renders TYPE_PIIX3_XEN_DEVICE redundant and finally removes > it. The motivation is to 1/ decouple PIIX from Xen and 2/ to make Xen in the > PC > machine agnostic to the precise southbridge being used. 2/ will become > particularily interesting once PIIX4 becomes usable in the PC machine, > avoiding > the "Frankenstein" use of PIIX4_ACPI in PIIX3. > > Testing done: > None, because I don't know how to conduct this properly :( > > Based-on: <20221221170003.2929-1-shentey@xxxxxxxxx> > "[PATCH v4 00/30] Consolidate PIIX south bridges" > > Bernhard Beschow (6): > include/hw/xen/xen: Make xen_piix3_set_irq() generic and rename it > hw/isa/piix: Reuse piix3_realize() in piix3_xen_realize() > hw/isa/piix: Wire up Xen PCI IRQ handling outside of PIIX3 > hw/isa/piix: Avoid Xen-specific variant of piix_write_config() > hw/isa/piix: Resolve redundant k->config_write assignments > hw/isa/piix: Resolve redundant TYPE_PIIX3_XEN_DEVICE > > hw/i386/pc_piix.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++-- > hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c | 9 +++-- > hw/isa/piix.c | 66 +---------------------------------- This file does not exist on the Qemu master branch. But hw/isa/piix3.c and hw/isa/piix4.c do exist. I tried renaming it from piix.c to piix3.c in the patch, but the patch set still does not apply cleanly on my tree. Is this patch set re-based against something other than the current master Qemu branch? I have a system that is suitable for testing this patch set, but I need guidance on how to apply it to the Qemu source tree. Thanks, Chuck Zmudzinski > include/hw/southbridge/piix.h | 1 - > include/hw/xen/xen.h | 2 +- > stubs/xen-hw-stub.c | 2 +- > 6 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |