[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: objtool warning for next-20221118
- To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 06:30:35 +0100
- Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>, "sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx" <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx" <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 05:30:56 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 24.11.22 17:39, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 08:47:47AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
@@ -385,17 +385,9 @@ static void xen_pv_play_dead(void) /* used only
with HOTPLUG_CPU */
{
play_dead_common();
HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_down, xen_vcpu_nr(smp_processor_id()), NULL);
- cpu_bringup();
- /*
- * commit 4b0c0f294 (tick: Cleanup NOHZ per cpu data on cpu down)
- * clears certain data that the cpu_idle loop (which called us
- * and that we return from) expects. The only way to get that
- * data back is to call:
- */
- tick_nohz_idle_enter();
- tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick_protected();
- cpuhp_online_idle(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE);
+ /* FIXME: converge cpu_bringup_and_idle() and start_secondary() */
+ cpu_bringup_and_idle();
I think this will leak stack memory. Multiple cpu offline/online cycles of
the same cpu will finally exhaust the idle stack.
Doh! Of course...
I was actually thinking ahead, to where eventually xen_pv_play_dead()
can call start_cpu0(), which can be changed to automatically reset the
stack pointer like this:
SYM_CODE_START(start_cpu0)
ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY
movq PER_CPU_VAR(pcpu_hot + X86_top_of_stack), %rax
leaq -PTREGS_SIZE(%rax), %rsp
jmp .Ljump_to_C_code
SYM_CODE_END(start_cpu0)
but that would only be possible be after more cleanups which converge
cpu_bringup_and_idle() with start_secondary().
The attached patch seems to work fine.
The patch looks good to me.
It doesn't solve Paul's original issue where arch_cpu_idle_dead() needs
to be __noreturn. But that should probably be a separate patch anyway.
Okay, I'll split this off.
The __noreturn annotation seems to trigger an objtool warning, though, in
spite of the added BUG() at the end of xen_pv_play_dead():
arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.o: warning: objtool: xen_pv_play_dead() falls through to
next function xen_pv_cpu_die()
You'll need to tell objtool that xen_cpu_bringup_again() is noreturn by
adding "xen_cpu_bringup_again" to global_noreturns[] in
tools/objtool/check.c.
Ah, okay. Will do that.
(Yes it's a pain, I'll be working an improved solution to the noreturn
thing...)
Should be fairly easy, no?
"Just" extend the __noreturn macro to put the function into a ".text.noreturn"
section, which can be handled in a special way by objtool. This would need
an __init_noreturn macro, of course, for a ".init.text.noreturn" section.
Juergen
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
|