Re: [PATCH 4/9] include/xen: Use explicitly specified types

[Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On 20/06/2022 08:02, Michal Orzel wrote:
> According to MISRA C 2012 Rule 8.1, types shall be explicitly
> specified. Fix all the findings reported by cppcheck with misra addon
> by substituting implicit type 'unsigned' to explicit 'unsigned int'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>   xen/include/xen/perfc.h | 2 +-
>   xen/include/xen/sched.h | 6 +++---
>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/perfc.h b/xen/include/xen/perfc.h
> index bb010b0aae..7c5ce537bd 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/perfc.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/perfc.h
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ enum perfcounter {
>   #undef PERFSTATUS
>   #undef PERFSTATUS_ARRAY
>   
> -typedef unsigned perfc_t;
> +typedef unsigned int perfc_t;
>   #define PRIperfc ""
>   
>   DECLARE_PER_CPU(perfc_t[NUM_PERFCOUNTERS], perfcounters);
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/sched.h b/xen/include/xen/sched.h
> index 463d41ffb6..d957b6e11f 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/sched.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/sched.h
> @@ -518,9 +518,9 @@ struct domain
>   
>       /* hvm_print_line() and guest_console_write() logging. */
>   #define DOMAIN_PBUF_SIZE 200
> -    char       *pbuf;
> -    unsigned    pbuf_idx;
> -    spinlock_t  pbuf_lock;
> +    char         *pbuf;
> +    unsigned int  pbuf_idx;
> +    spinlock_t    pbuf_lock;
Looking a "struct domain", we don't often seem to align the name. In 
fact, this is something I don't particularly like because it adds a lot 
of churn in a patch.
So my preference would be to just change the line "unsigned".

Other than that:

Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx>

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall