Re: [PATCH RFC v1 3/7] swiotlb-xen: support highmem for xen specific code

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 05:55:49PM -0700, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> @@ -109,19 +110,25 @@ int xen_swiotlb_fixup(void *buf, unsigned long nslabs, 
> bool high)
>       int rc;
>       unsigned int order = get_order(IO_TLB_SEGSIZE << IO_TLB_SHIFT);
>       unsigned int i, dma_bits = order + PAGE_SHIFT;
> +     unsigned int max_dma_bits = MAX_DMA32_BITS;
>       dma_addr_t dma_handle;
>       phys_addr_t p = virt_to_phys(buf);
>  
>       BUILD_BUG_ON(IO_TLB_SEGSIZE & (IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - 1));
>       BUG_ON(nslabs % IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
>  
> +     if (high) {
> +             dma_bits = MAX_DMA64_BITS;
> +             max_dma_bits = MAX_DMA64_BITS;
> +     }
> +

I think you really want to pass the addressing bits or mask to the
remap callback and not do magic with a 'high' flag here.