Re: Virtio on Xen with Rust

[Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 29-04-22, 13:44, Oleksandr wrote:
> On 29.04.22 06:48, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > What should I do about these patches ? Send them to xen list ? I can at 
> > least
> > send the stuff which doesn't depend on your series ?
> 
> Below my understanding, which might be wrong)
> 
> 
> I think, the best case scenario - is to try to get these features
> upstreamed. I expect a possible interest to virtulized I2C/GPIO devices on
> Xen,
> especially in embedded environment where the passthrough of dedicated
> I2C/GPIO controller to the guest is not possible for some reason (clocks,
> pins, power domains, etc).
> But I do understand it most likely takes some time. If upsteaming this stuff
> is not your primary target, then I think, such patch series deserves to be
> sent to the Xen mailing list anyway for someone who is interested in the
> topic to give it a try. For example, you can send RFC version saying in
> cover letter that it depends on non-upsteamed yet stuff to start discussion.

I have sent the patchset to xen list. Thanks.

-- 
viresh