[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 17/30] tracing: Improve panic/die notifiers
- To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:46:35 -0300
- Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bhe@xxxxxxxxxx, pmladek@xxxxxxxx, kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx, coresight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-edac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-leds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-remoteproc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openipmi-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel-dev@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx, halves@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fabiomirmar@xxxxxxxxx, alejandro.j.jimenez@xxxxxxxxxx, andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, arnd@xxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx, d.hatayama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx, feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hidehiro.kawai.ez@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgross@xxxxxxxx, john.ogness@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx, luto@xxxxxxxxxx, mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx, stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx, vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:48:02 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 29/04/2022 10:23, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:22:44 +0300
> Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> + switch (ev) {
>>> + case DIE_OOPS:
>>> + do_dump = 1;
>>> + break;
>>> + case PANIC_NOTIFIER:
>>> + do_dump = 1;
>>> + break;
>>
>> Why not:
>>
>> case DIE_OOPS:
>> case PANIC_NOTIFIER:
>> do_dump = 1;
>> break;
>
> Agreed.
>
> Other than that.
>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> -- Steve
Thanks Sergei and Steven, good idea! I thought about the switch change
you propose, but I confess I got a bit confused by the "fallthrough"
keyword - do I need to use it?
About the s/int/bool, for sure! Not sure why I didn't use bool at
first...heheh
Cheers,
Guilherme
|
