[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 26/27] block: uncouple REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE from REQ_OP_DISCARD
 
- To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
 
- From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 17:26:56 +0200
 
- Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx,	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-nilfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ntfs3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
 
- Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 15:31:06 +0000
 
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
 
- Mail-followup-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>,	Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx,	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-nilfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ntfs3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
 
 
 
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 08:05:15AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Secure erase is a very different operation from discard in that it is
> a data integrity operation vs hint.  Fully split the limits and helper
> infrastructure to make the separation more clear.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c                    |  2 +-
>  block/blk-lib.c                     | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  block/blk-mq-debugfs.c              |  1 -
>  block/blk-settings.c                | 16 +++++++-
>  block/fops.c                        |  2 +-
>  block/ioctl.c                       | 43 +++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c  |  5 ++-
>  drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c       |  4 +-
>  drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv-dev.h   |  2 +-
>  drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c | 15 +++----
>  drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c  |  5 +--
>  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c        |  5 ++-
>  drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c           |  2 +-
>  drivers/md/dm-table.c               |  8 ++--
>  drivers/md/dm-thin.c                |  4 +-
>  drivers/md/md.c                     |  2 +-
>  drivers/md/raid5-cache.c            |  6 +--
>  drivers/mmc/core/queue.c            |  2 +-
>  drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-bdev.c   |  2 +-
>  drivers/target/target_core_file.c   |  2 +-
>  drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c |  2 +-
For
>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c              |  4 +-
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
 
 
    
     |