[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v4 11/11] xen/x86: remove cf_check attribute from hypercall handlers
On 17.03.2022 17:47, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 10.03.2022 08:34, Juergen Gross wrote: >> Now that the hypercall handlers are all being called directly instead >> through a function vector, the "cf_check" attribute can be removed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> >> --- >> V4: >> - new patch >> --- >> xen/arch/x86/compat.c | 6 +++--- >> xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 2 +- >> xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu.c | 2 +- >> xen/arch/x86/domain.c | 3 +-- >> xen/arch/x86/hvm/dm.c | 2 +- >> xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 2 +- >> xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c | 6 +++--- >> xen/arch/x86/mm.c | 12 ++++++------ >> xen/arch/x86/mm/paging.c | 2 +- >> xen/arch/x86/physdev.c | 2 +- >> xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c | 2 +- >> xen/arch/x86/pv/callback.c | 16 ++++++++-------- >> xen/arch/x86/pv/descriptor-tables.c | 8 ++++---- >> xen/arch/x86/pv/iret.c | 4 ++-- >> xen/arch/x86/pv/misc-hypercalls.c | 10 +++++----- >> xen/arch/x86/pv/shim.c | 4 ++-- >> xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c | 2 +- >> xen/common/argo.c | 4 ++-- >> xen/common/compat/grant_table.c | 2 +- >> xen/common/compat/kernel.c | 2 +- >> xen/common/compat/memory.c | 3 +-- >> xen/common/dm.c | 2 +- >> xen/common/domain.c | 2 +- >> xen/common/domctl.c | 2 +- >> xen/common/event_channel.c | 2 +- >> xen/common/grant_table.c | 3 +-- >> xen/common/hypfs.c | 2 +- >> xen/common/kernel.c | 2 +- >> xen/common/kexec.c | 4 ++-- >> xen/common/memory.c | 2 +- >> xen/common/multicall.c | 3 +-- >> xen/common/sched/compat.c | 2 +- >> xen/common/sched/core.c | 4 ++-- >> xen/common/sysctl.c | 2 +- >> xen/common/xenoprof.c | 2 +- >> xen/drivers/char/console.c | 2 +- >> xen/scripts/gen_hypercall.awk | 2 +- >> xen/xsm/xsm_core.c | 4 ++-- >> 38 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-) > > But that's only the definitions; for a reason I forget the annotations > are present also on the declarations (really the "also" applies the > other way around; perhaps it was that a future gcc will want to warn > about declaration and definition having gone out of sync). Actually wait, this was nonsense - the declarations are gone by this point, and the awk script adjustment is all that's needed. Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Jan
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |