[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 3/3] hvm/pirq: allow control domains usage of PHYSDEVOP_{un,}map_pirq
- To: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:43:03 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=olDlsQ0qXoghAxpSEMDWh2NF/+smfYSez6y5C9Z3n2M=; b=Wsb8W7R4P363EzJelpeoaMgs0SweId6l+Tju3TnQn0u963LbqfFvSz4R1g3RP65EbOMoym/ECPLsf4ONe44rC08wl2cf8tvGWJ3hqWnuvS7D36OsjQtifU0jC4HKMlvVn2LvEIiUc5h4NRicwFOJWzeccS+Ev0sQlu7pbJrjyMvRsDhPEV5fRxRTT4IlsmnSdeQ7vPmiYU/0C6XqfHlNOJJSMdLB9IWg2XbglGOwXEdbPSkf0tnWC81ady2zi6ps+8Y9LrUVDDw4S2y6Jnmv6MAG8IU9/2KDCIDBv48XSx8BsVuBpXIckOOYU90mEVFLTMahJV4tnYDXsLiGsOnlbg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GtN7/LetXhOAjee4DII3w1r39Xl9AM5t6POQxXWYjcIXVXLADm9pR/Y661Ss2G7PThKI6OC6ntZy+98iw77zwDFPjdeKWceNkBha3iDn+n3JtICNAeuPmRGr14Q7L1/VgKvZ0Kwx4+OsBRdL6V4Z973uCMdGYaN5htJvvuoVuTCUqcFHq4Oz8pwoW56ezty7WtuTC7Qji8epmsKJ3suM3wtDoEFusGVr7ahBPrpDIGStRg03ozAJLFP0ilkUJFWwveJxSDp6nZwcuVSS5c8PLtSol33HGjd6+6S7biU38wnlbkeaMy4zapamzV//u/SjyIrxJ4T6yi2XFoyT4jqwiw==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Alex Olson <this.is.a0lson@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 11:43:16 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 03.03.2022 12:40, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> Or do we just require people with split control/hardware domain model
> to also use a different XSM policy?
I've been under the impression that this is the intended model, yes.
Jan
|
