[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] arch: x86: xen: check the return value of kasprintf()
- To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxxxx>, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx
- From: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:27:44 +0100
- Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 13:27:52 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 25.02.22 09:11, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
The function kasprintf() can fail, but there is no check of its return
value. To fix this bug, its return value should be checked with new
error handling code.
Fixes: f87e4cac4f4e ("xen: SMP guest support")
Fixes: 83b96794e0ea ("x86/xen: split off smp_pv.c")
Fixes: d5de8841355a ("x86: split spinlock implementations out into their own
files")
Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 2 ++
arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c | 2 ++
arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
index c3e1f9a7d43a..91261390f8c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
@@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ int xen_smp_intr_init(unsigned int cpu)
char *resched_name, *callfunc_name, *debug_name;
resched_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "resched%d", cpu);
+ if (!resched_name)
+ return -ENOMEM;
There are 3 more instances of kasprintf() in this function.
rc = bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(XEN_RESCHEDULE_VECTOR,
cpu,
xen_reschedule_interrupt,
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
index 4a6019238ee7..7d1471fd1267 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
@@ -118,6 +118,8 @@ int xen_smp_intr_init_pv(unsigned int cpu)
char *callfunc_name, *pmu_name;
callfunc_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "irqwork%d", cpu);
+ if (!callfunc_name)
+ return -ENOMEM;
And in here is another one, too.
rc = bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(XEN_IRQ_WORK_VECTOR,
cpu,
xen_irq_work_interrupt,
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
index 043c73dfd2c9..ccdb9eddd93b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ void xen_init_lock_cpu(int cpu)
cpu, per_cpu(lock_kicker_irq, cpu));
name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "spinlock%d", cpu);
+ if (!name)
+ return;
Just failing silently is not nice.
irq = bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(XEN_SPIN_UNLOCK_VECTOR,
cpu,
dummy_handler,
Juergen
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
|