[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/spinlock: use lock address for lock debug functions
- To: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:12:33 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=fes2X8LHR3MmHa1Ck0Ecg5/fD1KI8vhvIkifjMXos50=; b=H92E9n1bEdFo2IwoUmjzHzKwjdlMxvyO21bmozor8UHgX4v8V2eEy7D5E3DDHsVsX6TVBjWRCkJQZSXCfKRyxpW1g7S1JN02GIj2O2UwupIuJ0JFVM3FSWvN9AvxBhk9i4awz8yA0RcGMx4vtufDx8m/nxLe57+4Rk3PLmFtntv9iOUOutfckYduZjUt1XnLse4GIPdj0hBxr4H7amtB2Lx507Y2IEL1s013HwyxHpEHujfXf+xNB16MNGLgXUsjRJJfBx2tmengmgQQsJbuUl7esg35I5mIJ3tE9BE1+IWBVAw3uZ/1IC/b2R4FKft8EpJ0ps7COmMLICxzMwXJdA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=n1AsVCk6Px3c2/+YbNqJC29nsRKKNDHPplikvJ3VPMMSkpOr4pC7T9Apeq7GB8Qa4Yd/DaSqRgjI4LWH8ANsPJ99jtQ3O/Tx7f2ov3ya1qR1zc6XZ7irbhH2roBq3cs9ue0Y7+NCZYAb4DMr36T0uuFaTho/AsjGyOVmJEmFsHWWCgqnxtgjmwvcuQdFuamWrhHRnoAjHvj6bqCsSllD2PNgGtN36VZDtXKu8k4KAnxUvUgz0zxsb0dA3ndj0otp6C9OiDZKXiuiFerHhqzZIBtviNe+NEbdsSNx5cjoTP/RaRfDsj8hkjb7BahTCU5yy2CoADkmAZQiL0HrDKkLiw==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 16:12:41 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 24.02.2022 11:54, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Instead of only passing the lock_debug address to check_lock() et al
> use the address of the spinlock.
I'm uncertain about this full exposure. The next patch looks to again
only use the new "data" subfield in these debugging helpers.
Jan
|
