RE: [PATCH V3 5/13] hid: use time_is_after_jiffies() instead of open coding it

[王擎 <wangqing@xxxxxxxx>]

>>On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 2:56 AM Qing Wang <wangqing@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> From: Wang Qing <wangqing@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Use the helper function time_is_{before,after}_jiffies() to improve
>> code readability.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@xxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>FWIW, this one is
>Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Wang, is there any plan to take this series through the trivial tree

That's why I batch them in a series, but I don't know how to take 
this series through the trivial tree directly.

I would appreciate if you could help.

Thanks,
Wang

>or should each maintainer take the matching patches?
>
>Cheers,
>Benjamin
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c 
>> b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c
>> index 8ccb246..15e1423
>> --- a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c
>> @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static void _ish_sync_fw_clock(struct ishtp_device *dev)
>>         static unsigned long    prev_sync;
>>         uint64_t        usec;
>>
>> -       if (prev_sync && jiffies - prev_sync < 20 * HZ)
>> +       if (prev_sync && time_is_after_jiffies(prev_sync + 20 * HZ))
>>                 return;
>>
>>         prev_sync = jiffies;
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>