Re: [PATCH 5/5] xenperf: name "newer" hypercalls

[Andrew Cooper <amc96@xxxxxxxx>]

On 03/12/2021 12:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
> This table must not have got updated in quite a while; tmem_op for
> example has managed to not only appear since then, but also disappear
> again (adding a name for it nevertheless, to make more obvious that
> something strange is going on if the slot would ever have a non-zero
> value).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> I wasn't really sure about x86's real names for arch_0 and arch_1. The
> tool runs on the same host as the hypervisor, so __i386__ / __x86_64__
> conditionals wouldn't be inappropriate to use ...

This is a developer tool.  Noone is going to have a perfcounter enabled
hypervisor in production.

Therefore, I think the ifdef's will be fine.

Preferably with, but either way, Acked-by: Andrew Cooper
<andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>