[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] x86: ACPI / APIC / IOMMU interaction
- To: Andrew Cooper <amc96@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:20:46 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=4YHrVYXhFY8N/CjkmefMZHQwY68DAEjz+e6XBcKGUEI=; b=E1IFJc2cQwseS/5CNlnMCp/m8BzE7u1m80ptPWVz52I5SCCdn5eYyL5Ci0r4iUr1eIqzJL5+BxHxfW18p+1/xOw0WfHvqyPSwZAIY7aRSAGFpLWz/NGaESb6/RCfeetV70K/SwvBhhl3k20rJ3U6FRyqeQNPzfJT1TAR/azyEC63x4MQo32eSAORy4/J69FoNEi1L3xclSHtpAtQExeI1ZDzBCYE8w0qvBeYsrKFv3U2ZfwVTUk/LCWVrDMB6hL7xxmFKgr0EQUpL6bmKla0ieANYvtgl40aILZ224PgFGCczomixB2Ht794gNWOw+0EXNRaaZz0mZKsXoUICdHBZA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=j9IPuRuOzySy7nHljyVABQho0HtD1N93908eJIKy/zpAmJcNw8zATRGxxn6JzBaEKp2WYifVM4zG/gYyRKAQQdnob5psEYBzcAWwq6wGjhYzTkPtHovcrj7jXkHuVrHV7plHc+n0AegHis9tXeppQxjolM6foVs/N41GsyVotxbhb8NeZ/9vvUYS2aReqaq2DUfA2dSzcWL0Z2nPwYui3vcjiPiDsIU5zd830IT/qwaSiPsCqJOzsAHkcmYt6okl1l7SZJTFrSfWmEBoB9S/l5dDZ+rc1SEWgxeO6NUZdQI/mgxk3ZpQog8IVXKR2Jb87f6nGOYiBO3Skx0ZuqLyzw==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:21:10 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 16.11.2021 13:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/11/2021 12:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> While reworking patch 1 (the only one here that I consider a candidate
>> for 4.16; see there) I stumbled over quite a few things that have long
>> been ripe for cleaning up. Hence the tail of 5 further patches ...
>>
>> 1: x2APIC: defer probe until after IOMMU ACPI table parsing
>> 2: APIC: drop clustered_apic_check() hook
>> 3: APIC: drop {acpi_madt,mps}_oem_check() hooks
>> 4: APIC: drop probe_default()
>> 5: APIC: rename cmdline_apic
>> 6: ACPI: drop dead interpreter-related code
>
> Patches 2 thru 6 clean up an area I'd recently stumbled upon.
>
> Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks.
> Patch 1 is looking very risky at this point, especially given the late
> correction, and I think it would be wise to wait for 4.17.
Well, that's also been my takeaway from Ian's responses so far. I did
put a question mark there because I wanted it to be considered without
meaning to actually push for it.
Jan
|