[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [linux-linus test] 166151: regressions - FAIL


  • To: osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:33:41 +0100
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=k0WOFLme123Z+8DoAJrxNddKPNy2Gl8yWwJFEBzzz6c=; b=QGEdXP8EChjdrCYsf1ABrUjW9yCYZzDRmGlc94JGHPhTcaaTrZtPQ8klJmR7OR8zQs8mgtC6WPX0S4eJyPHAQ/lQcl95feABSNl774/rHAg9Uw5QqKOjAn8yAImJGTfjLc+CgYH9ylQKU5VbKWQKuuv7UEQ2sj3fm1mD9Wx/Z2z3hUdgjOMjrQMm/u5ocXW0G+6wnTtsi+jDypZpVavtoiPyApcald554smSD0e/Y308vckzGArVjB3E5Ol0EV8Gmy3szld5Qe6B60CseN5/ujou40EJIn1op4t/Ulleu6kEJM538qupjXepelrTtE/T1qRmGjhQebv2+nqNcaXkTg==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=noPavCY5hAqVKhymyeZjNNjTjHKh9f55tTA+TH2TUa7vfo8Qyw7DxWnPGBevQMG3jV6mDdRe6kRoGaELhdDlyCFZgpwJy5rVDpRERVehyMoId9MZ2QMRDlswS27xnmCNPmVvqzFotts99ZX02ucjgJIgxnrcrSef+a7ig6D9udxR9KAHaCt+DWRjg4OkJInW1yOxWLPyT5fkyzOtsNM7QXhCuwojyUdCG5FUKfKAEcS8jU93h7q1wi+sKLpbqkE33uFEcmiGOrvBiBbJVditrOhERSQi7EFVe+rpFjrPrMTGZXJZ3MWpzzKcpUt/BoWbtPOeqCa1aOQG5Br/akt1MQ==
  • Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 07:33:58 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 16.11.2021 05:42, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 166151 linux-linus real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/166151/
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  build-i386-pvops              6 kernel-build             fail REGR. vs. 
> 165976

I'm puzzled by this in two ways: First that this is being done at all,
when 32-bit PV Xen support has gone away several releases back. If the
purpose is to cover PVH and/or HVM, then I guess the test name has
become misleading.

And second that this fails on a KVM related build error:

arch/x86/kvm/x86.c: In function ‘vcpu_enter_guest’:
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:9948:1: error: unsupported size for integer register
 }
 ^
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:287: arch/x86/kvm/x86.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

To limit the risk of unrelated build breakage, wouldn't it make sense
to keep off Kconfig settings which aren't really of interest?

>  test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck  8 xen-boot               fail REGR. vs. 
> 165976
>  test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd       8 xen-boot                 fail REGR. vs. 
> 165976
>  test-armhf-armhf-libvirt      8 xen-boot                 fail REGR. vs. 
> 165976
>  test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu  8 xen-boot                fail REGR. vs. 
> 165976
>  test-armhf-armhf-xl           8 xen-boot                 fail REGR. vs. 
> 165976
>  test-armhf-armhf-examine      8 reboot                   fail REGR. vs. 
> 165976
>  test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2  8 xen-boot               fail REGR. vs. 
> 165976
>  test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1   8 xen-boot                 fail REGR. vs. 
> 165976
>  test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw  8 xen-boot                 fail REGR. vs. 
> 165976
>  test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2   8 xen-boot                 fail REGR. vs. 
> 165976

For these I assume Arm folks are aware and will look into the cause.
At a first glance it seems to be the NIC driver which is unhappy.

Jan




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.