[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] xen/arm: Check for PMU platform support



Hi Julien,

On 11.10.2021 12:17, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> On 11/10/2021 10:00, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> ID_AA64DFR0_EL1/ID_DFR0_EL1 registers provide
>> information about PMU support. Replace structure
>> dbg64/dbg32 with a union and fill in all the
>> register fields according to document:
>> ARM Architecture Registers(DDI 0595, 2021-06).
>>
>> Add macros boot_dbg_feature64/boot_dbg_feature32
>> to check for a debug feature. Add macro
>> cpu_has_pmu to check for PMU support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes since v3:
>> -none
>> Changes since v2:
>> -none
>> Changes since v1:
>> -new in v2
>> ---
>>   xen/include/asm-arm/cpufeature.h | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/cpufeature.h 
>> b/xen/include/asm-arm/cpufeature.h
>> index 5ca09b0bff..4fce23844d 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/cpufeature.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/cpufeature.h
>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
>>   #define cpu_feature64(c, feat)         ((c)->pfr64.feat)
>>   #define boot_cpu_feature64(feat)       (system_cpuinfo.pfr64.feat)
>> +#define boot_dbg_feature64(feat)       (system_cpuinfo.dbg64.feat)
>>     #define cpu_feature64_has_el0_32(c)    (cpu_feature64(c, el0) == 2)
>>   @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@
>>     #define cpu_feature32(c, feat)         ((c)->pfr32.feat)
>>   #define boot_cpu_feature32(feat)       (system_cpuinfo.pfr32.feat)
>> +#define boot_dbg_feature32(feat)       (system_cpuinfo.dbg32.feat)
>>     #define cpu_has_arm       (boot_cpu_feature32(arm) == 1)
>>   #define cpu_has_thumb     (boot_cpu_feature32(thumb) >= 1)
>> @@ -32,8 +34,10 @@
>>     #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32
>>   #define cpu_has_gentimer  (boot_cpu_feature32(gentimer) == 1)
>> +#define cpu_has_pmu       (boot_dbg_feature32(perfmon) >= 1)
> 
> From my understanding, on Armv7, perfmon == 0 only means PMUv2 is not 
> present. IOW, it doesn't say whether PMUv1 is supported.
> 
> I think it is OK to treat as the PMU is not supported (ARMv8 treat it like 
> that too), but I would like a comment in the code so it is clear this is a 
> deliberate choice.
> 
We are checking if any version of PMU is supported meaning perfmon is >=1.
On ARMv8 any value higher than 0 means that PMU is present. 0 means not 
supported.
On ARMv7 the above is not really true. Any value higher than 0 and lower than 
15 means the PMU is supported.
So I think I should do:
#define cpu_has_pmu       ((boot_dbg_feature32(perfmon) >= 1) && \
                           (boot_dbg_feature32(perfmon) < 15))

Do you agree? 

>>   #else
>>   #define cpu_has_gentimer  (1)
>> +#define cpu_has_pmu       (boot_dbg_feature64(pmu_ver) >= 1)
>>   #endif
>>   #define cpu_has_security  (boot_cpu_feature32(security) > 0)
>>   @@ -181,8 +185,28 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm {
>>           };
>>       } pfr64;
>>   -    struct {
>> +    union {
>>           register_t bits[2];
>> +        struct {
>> +            /* DFR0 */
>> +            unsigned long debug_ver:4;
>> +            unsigned long trace_ver:4;
>> +            unsigned long pmu_ver:4;
>> +            unsigned long brps:4;
>> +            unsigned long __res0:4;
>> +            unsigned long wrps:4;
>> +            unsigned long __res1:4;
>> +            unsigned long ctx_cmps:4;
>> +            unsigned long pms_ver:4;
>> +            unsigned long double_lock:4;
>> +            unsigned long trace_filt:4;
>> +            unsigned long __res2:4;
>> +            unsigned long mtpmu:4;
>> +            unsigned long __res3:12;
>> +
>> +            /* DFR1 */
>> +            unsigned long __res4:64;
>> +        };
>>       } dbg64;
>>         struct {
>> @@ -321,8 +345,29 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm {
>>           };
>>       } pfr32;
>>   -    struct {
>> +    union {
>>           register_t bits[2];
>> +        struct {
>> +            /* DFR0 */
>> +            unsigned long copdbg:4;
>> +            unsigned long copsdbg:4;
>> +            unsigned long mmapdbg:4;
>> +            unsigned long coptrc:4;
>> +            unsigned long mmaptrc:4;
>> +            unsigned long mprofdbg:4;
>> +            unsigned long perfmon:4;
>> +            unsigned long tracefilt:4;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
>> +            unsigned long __res0:32;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +            /* DFR1 */
>> +            unsigned long mtpmu:4;
>> +            unsigned long __res1:28;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
>> +            unsigned long __res2:32;
>> +#endif
>> +        };
>>       } dbg32;
>>         struct {
>>
> 
> Cheers,
> 

Cheers,
Michal



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.