[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 00/15] perf: KVM: Fix, optimize, and clean up callbacks



On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 02:52:25PM +0800, Like Xu wrote:
> + STATIC BRANCH/CALL friends.
> 
> On 27/8/2021 8:57 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > This started out as a small series[1] to fix a KVM bug related to Intel PT
> > interrupt handling and snowballed horribly.
> > 
> > The main problem being addressed is that the perf_guest_cbs are shared by
> > all CPUs, can be nullified by KVM during module unload, and are not
> > protected against concurrent access from NMI context.
> 
> Shouldn't this be a generic issue of the static_call() usage ?
> 
> At the beginning, we set up the static entry assuming perf_guest_cbs != NULL:
> 
>       if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->handle_intel_pt_intr) {
>               static_call_update(x86_guest_handle_intel_pt_intr,
>                                  perf_guest_cbs->handle_intel_pt_intr);
>       }
> 
> and then we unset the perf_guest_cbs and do the static function call like 
> this:
> 
> DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(x86_guest_handle_intel_pt_intr,
> *(perf_guest_cbs->handle_intel_pt_intr));
> static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
> {
>               ...
>               if (!static_call(x86_guest_handle_intel_pt_intr)())
>                       intel_pt_interrupt();
>               ...
> }

You just have to make sure all static_call() invocations that started
before unreg are finished before continuing with the unload.
synchronize_rcu() can help with that.

This is module unload 101. Nothing specific to static_call().



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.