Re: [PATCH] stubdom: foreignmemory: Fix build after 0dbb4be739c5

[Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>]

On 13/07/2021 15:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.07.2021 16:19, Julien Grall wrote:
> > On 13/07/2021 15:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > And I don't think it should be named XC_PAGE_*, but rather XEN_PAGE_*.
> > > Even that doesn't seem right to me, at least in principle. There shouldn't
> > > be a build time setting when it may vary at runtime. IOW on Arm I think a
> > > runtime query to the hypervisor would be needed instead.
> > Yes, we want to be able to use the same userspace/OS without rebuilding
> > to a specific hypervisor page size.
> >
> > > And thinking
> > > even more generally, perhaps there could also be mixed (base) page sizes
> > > in use at run time, so it may need to be a bit mask which gets returned.
> > I am not sure to understand this. Are you saying the hypervisor may use
> > at the same time different page size?
> I think so, yes. And I further think the hypervisor could even allow its
> guests to do so.
This is already the case on Arm. We need to differentiate between the 
page size used by the guest and the one used by Xen for the stage-2 page 
table (what you call EPT on x86).
In this case, we are talking about the page size used by the hypervisor 
to configure the stage-2 page table
> There would be a distinction between the granularity at
> which RAM gets allocated and the granularity at which page mappings (RAM
> or other) can be established. Which yields an environment which I'd say
> has no clear "system page size".
I don't quite understand why you would allocate and etablish the memory 
with a different page size in the hypervisor. Can you give an example?
Cheers,

--
Julien Grall