[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v15 06/12] swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce for swiotlb data bouncing

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 9:43 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:55:20PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> > Propagate the swiotlb_force into io_tlb_default_mem->force_bounce and
> > use it to determine whether to bounce the data or not. This will be
> > useful later to allow for different pools.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> This patch as commit af452ec1b1a3 ("swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce
> for swiotlb data bouncing") causes my Ryzen 3 4300G system to fail to
> get to an X session consistently (although not every single time),
> presumably due to a crash in the AMDGPU driver that I see in dmesg.
> I have attached logs at af452ec1b1a3 and f127c9556a8e and I am happy
> to provide any further information, debug, or test patches as necessary.

Are you using swiotlb=force? or the swiotlb_map is called because of

`BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000003a8290` and
the fact it crashed at `_raw_spin_lock_irqsave` look like the memory
(maybe dev->dma_io_tlb_mem) was corrupted?
The dev->dma_io_tlb_mem should be set here
through device_initialize.

I can't tell what happened from the logs, but maybe we could try KASAN
to see if it provides more clue.


> Cheers,
> Nathan



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.