[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v14 06/12] swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce for swiotlb data bouncing

On 2021-06-24 07:05, Claire Chang wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 1:43 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 02:44:34PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
is_swiotlb_force_bounce at /usr/src/linux-next/./include/linux/swiotlb.h:119

is_swiotlb_force_bounce() was the new function introduced in this patch here.

+static inline bool is_swiotlb_force_bounce(struct device *dev)
+     return dev->dma_io_tlb_mem->force_bounce;

To me the crash looks like dev->dma_io_tlb_mem is NULL.  Can you
turn this into :

         return dev->dma_io_tlb_mem && dev->dma_io_tlb_mem->force_bounce;

for a quick debug check?

I just realized that dma_io_tlb_mem might be NULL like Christoph
pointed out since swiotlb might not get initialized.
However,  `Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
dfff80000000000e` looks more like the address is garbage rather than
I wonder if that's because dev->dma_io_tlb_mem is not assigned
properly (which means device_initialize is not called?).

What also looks odd is that the base "address" 0xdfff800000000000 is held in a couple of registers, but the offset 0xe looks too small to match up to any relevant structure member in that dereference chain :/




Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.