[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] i386: load kernel on xen using DMA
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Kernel on Xen is loaded via fw_cfg. Previously it used non-DMA version, > which loaded the kernel (and initramfs) byte by byte. Change this > to DMA, to load in bigger chunks. > This change alone reduces load time of a (big) kernel+initramfs from > ~10s down to below 1s. > > This change was suggested initially here: > https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20180216204031.000052e9@xxxxxxxxx/ > Apparently this alone is already enough to get massive speedup. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > hw/i386/pc.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c > index 8a84b25a03..14e43d4da4 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/pc.c > +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c > @@ -839,7 +839,8 @@ void xen_load_linux(PCMachineState *pcms) > > assert(MACHINE(pcms)->kernel_filename != NULL); > > - fw_cfg = fw_cfg_init_io(FW_CFG_IO_BASE); > + fw_cfg = fw_cfg_init_io_dma(FW_CFG_IO_BASE, FW_CFG_IO_BASE + 4, > + &address_space_memory); > fw_cfg_add_i16(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_NB_CPUS, x86ms->boot_cpus); > rom_set_fw(fw_cfg); Gentle ping. The fix looks perfectly sane to me but I don't have any x86 Xen HW to test this one. Are the x86 maintainers happy to take this on? FWIW: Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Alex Bennée
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |