[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BUG in 1f3d87c75129 ("x86/vpt: do not take pt_migrate rwlock in some cases")


  • To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 13:06:12 -0400
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=oracle.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=oracle.com; dkim=pass header.d=oracle.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=pOhayWF3jHa74pK6+doXkbZAgoBrEXaNbZOgZRCzPEQ=; b=jdc0ksrfuwWKwGz2bpOjEhdxln5hr34e9uUiwpS4TU87u1nzCZt7484rIjk4V0qjVQJCd3CBQsHwVEuzOOkC61OKhm68cfNZ1oBu6p1TBl8pL6QB8JQ/rT3wsa6GoECjC/7RWNAdHt7AQ23v4nQ1i3td/Z6Il9xx0PyojJ7A5AxDXN+vSRjFq66w5L2xeV3luYpesWLIE3lSFHNIBMS/I+xeHoM6Q5k+5zVLVf3NPwetPIcxOy+0XfrlYZAEnEvWwaZ4eoc2GEYxAXNHprJcJ4NmHcomrH5h4JkPedmS6c1eyr7WHggMJvlNBFZP9x8UO+J1wIAPxlEhvLqrrGJ+Gw==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=h0bGJeqWhUWj9y3a2e7ISHHwBJideCpoxz6o9YCVqeDUA2cdd5JKRk6VfkXIgWDdUlNdC/wjRdP6XE3Lbh15jhCnAGEWFw8hYSqd9eWGyfiaCyjvhiCcLMDPuVilH1CbCvDucgTI5T8JKbtDbXtCU1kCXPSg3ka9GCWF0Vy3ciLpwJ8crZz7fkzThIRwwtn0NDMmoNiBfzy0LCJ5t+R0h7vuf0eNX2WcGBAMPMViBSBAlWwt1ABq1Sf3Esll4HvCwiX+xuA4sU5+XhZdx+62VUwQjD2zRSvA05o5LnQ22Ax18kDWxcqfCNPbC5PXZ0xewW7lsR8UGvO/gXsJFAsPzA==
  • Cc: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, stephen.s.brennan@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:06:30 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 6/14/21 12:10 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 14/06/2021 17:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 14.06.2021 15:27, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 01:53:09PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 14.06.2021 13:15, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>>>>> Hi, Boris, Stephen, Roger,
>>>>>
>>>>> We have stress tested recent changes on staging-4.13 which includes a
>>>>> backport of the subject. Since the backport is identical to the
>>>>> master branch and all of the pre-reqs are in place - we have no reason
>>>>> to believe the issue is not the same on master.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is what we got by running heavy stress testing including multiple
>>>>> repeated VM lifecycle operations with storage and network load:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Assertion 'timer->status >= TIMER_STATUS_inactive' failed at timer.c:287
>>>>> ----[ Xen-4.13.3-10.7-d  x86_64  debug=y   Not tainted ]----
>>>>> CPU:    17
>>>>> RIP:    e008:[<ffff82d080246b65>] common/timer.c#active_timer+0xc/0x1b
>>>>> RFLAGS: 0000000000010046   CONTEXT: hypervisor (d675v0)
>>>>> rax: 0000000000000000   rbx: ffff83137a8ed300   rcx: 0000000000000000
>>>>> rdx: ffff83303fff7fff   rsi: ffff83303fff2549   rdi: ffff83137a8ed300
>>>>> rbp: ffff83303fff7cf8   rsp: ffff83303fff7cf8   r8:  0000000000000001
>>>>> r9:  0000000000000000   r10: 0000000000000011   r11: 0000168b0cc08083
>>>>> r12: 0000000000000000   r13: ffff82d0805cf300   r14: ffff82d0805cf300
>>>>> r15: 0000000000000292   cr0: 0000000080050033   cr4: 00000000000426e0
>>>>> cr3: 00000013c1a32000   cr2: 0000000000000000
>>>>> fsb: 0000000000000000   gsb: 0000000000000000   gss: 0000000000000000
>>>>> ds: 0000   es: 0000   fs: 0000   gs: 0000   ss: 0000   cs: e008
>>>>> Xen code around <ffff82d080246b65> (common/timer.c#active_timer+0xc/0x1b):
>>>>>   0f b6 47 2a 84 c0 75 02 <0f> 0b 3c 04 76 02 0f 0b 3c 02 0f 97 c0 5d c3 
>>>>> 55
>>>>> Xen stack trace from rsp=ffff83303fff7cf8:
>>>>>     ffff83303fff7d48 ffff82d0802479f1 0000168b0192b846 ffff83137a8ed328
>>>>>     000000001d0776eb ffff83137a8ed2c0 ffff83133ee47568 ffff83133ee47000
>>>>>     ffff83133ee47560 ffff832b1a0cd000 ffff83303fff7d78 ffff82d08031e74e
>>>>>     ffff83102d898000 ffff83133ee47000 ffff83102db8d000 0000000000000011
>>>>>     ffff83303fff7dc8 ffff82d08027df19 0000000000000000 ffff83133ee47060
>>>>>     ffff82d0805d0088 ffff83102d898000 ffff83133ee47000 0000000000000011
>>>>>     0000000000000001 0000000000000011 ffff83303fff7e08 ffff82d0802414e0
>>>>>     ffff83303fff7df8 0000168b0192b846 ffff83102d8a4660 0000168b0192b846
>>>>>     ffff83102d8a4720 0000000000000011 ffff83303fff7ea8 ffff82d080241d6c
>>>>>     ffff83133ee47000 ffff831244137a50 ffff83303fff7e48 ffff82d08031b5b8
>>>>>     ffff83133ee47000 ffff832b1a0cd000 ffff83303fff7e68 ffff82d080312b65
>>>>>     ffff83133ee47000 0000000000000000 ffff83303fff7ee8 ffff83102d8a4678
>>>>>     ffff83303fff7ee8 ffff82d0805d6380 ffff82d0805d5b00 ffffffffffffffff
>>>>>     ffff83303fff7fff 0000000000000000 ffff83303fff7ed8 ffff82d0802431f5
>>>>>     ffff83133ee47000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>>>>>     ffff83303fff7ee8 ffff82d08024324a 00007ccfc00080e7 ffff82d08033930b
>>>>>     ffffffffb0ebd5a0 000000000000000d 0000000000000062 0000000000000097
>>>>>     000000000000001e 000000000000001f ffffffffb0ebd5ad 0000000000000000
>>>>>     0000000000000005 000000000003d91d 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>>>>>     00000000000003d5 000000000000001e 0000000000000000 0000beef0000beef
>>>>> Xen call trace:
>>>>>     [<ffff82d080246b65>] R common/timer.c#active_timer+0xc/0x1b
>>>>>     [<ffff82d0802479f1>] F stop_timer+0xf5/0x188
>>>>>     [<ffff82d08031e74e>] F pt_save_timer+0x45/0x8a
>>>>>     [<ffff82d08027df19>] F context_switch+0xf9/0xee0
>>>>>     [<ffff82d0802414e0>] F 
>>>>> common/schedule.c#sched_context_switch+0x146/0x151
>>>>>     [<ffff82d080241d6c>] F common/schedule.c#schedule+0x28a/0x299
>>>>>     [<ffff82d0802431f5>] F common/softirq.c#__do_softirq+0x85/0x90
>>>>>     [<ffff82d08024324a>] F do_softirq+0x13/0x15
>>>>>     [<ffff82d08033930b>] F vmx_asm_do_vmentry+0x2b/0x30
>>>>>
>>>>> ****************************************
>>>>> Panic on CPU 17:
>>>>> Assertion 'timer->status >= TIMER_STATUS_inactive' failed at timer.c:287
>>>>> ****************************************
>>>> Since this suggests a timer was found on the list without ever having been
>>>> initialized, I've spotted a case where this indeed could now happen. Could
>>>> you give the patch below a try?
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>> x86/vpt: fully init timers before putting onto list
>>>>
>>>> With pt_vcpu_lock() no longer acquiring the pt_migrate lock, parties
>>>> iterating the list and acting on the timers of the list entries will no
>>>> longer be kept from entering their loops by create_periodic_time()'s
>>>> holding of that lock. Therefore at least init_timer() needs calling
>>>> ahead of list insertion, but keep this and set_timer() together.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 8113b02f0bf8 ("x86/vpt: do not take pt_migrate rwlock in some 
>>>> cases")
>>>> Reported-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Thanks for looking into this so quickly, and sorry for not realizing
>>> myself when relaxing the locking. Adding the timer to the list without
>>> it being fully initialized was a latent issue even if protected by the
>>> lock initially.
>>>
>>> Provided testing shows the issue is fixed:
>> I guess the change here is needed anyway, even if testing finds there's
>> still something amiss?


Yes, I think so. Thanks for finding this.



Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>


> We've put this patch in for testing, but results will take a while,
> because it only showed up in our weekend stress testing.
>
> ~Andrew



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.