[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v20210601 07/38] tools: unify type checking for data pfns in migration stream
- To: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 13:21:14 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; strato.com; dkim=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1622632876; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=9vWpdbDZWYsZRwpTxs4xYixb0KM4n1SJg9aWcgBfw6g=; b=gkJQ5rl3aL9A+75Q6dRUBfkMC1GT9PA72eX1VaJ1TfXH4InhXJx50Nh1jdmsACxLfX VuDFkJ54TRg0zWKTwC1y+F9U/CYmsA03dESkFZ/0jCaMtPeuJKkdtnUrZYpPK36QoXiz E76ezHOY0gqX0tSmEOx8aDm90vPEEVaewAOtY7kb4DcIJVlLV2QNMDlZlqP2oZq8RYXC d7pjKwU9fbztsJO4JMVlMJmVnlOTWJpG8gg3uyCOJREjOkxoZ28vfdbz8tR6xIThx62v iPhJi0+3hM9Y+O1duw6IG8Q08vVeq0JdMojc2djpNdVxAV6sf3bOh873pzWYNruCeHzm uPpA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622632876; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=CtQ2P4CHqlLZR/bhH+ffeYRjSnSAIQ2RRrkKtKB5FwKxr0wKjum743DuXrWWk8/A+3 0tPh5GnGuJrvElAlD/1Wzi7w2Tw8d8bfk2eUGxXZMDzAyALY6cJqgksp0/VWyahOqbnR OMGwsx109EBDD1nG6uNr5LDb745qHugebg376wMwqtN3TkDG5XlgJMIkOzAueiVIZAvA oeynLJUgW0IL1lwse8E9f9xtyviLP5BnxtJneyDfb0DVwfDkLeubpZuIJxi5xcJBNkZn 0Rl6gogJ8YoSec5e9Rz6084sMkT6RSUQSNKqBWEO1STer70KAPd3jyj1rjnUR+3fM1b/ dZSQ==
- Authentication-results: strato.com; dkim=none
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 11:21:23 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
Am Wed, 2 Jun 2021 08:59:13 +0200
schrieb Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>:
> What about XEN_DOMCTL_PFINFO_XALLOC? Is this case impossible here, or
> are you changing behavior?
I think XEN_DOMCTL_PFINFO_XALLOC is a type that does not exist in practice.
So, no change in behavior.
Olaf
Attachment:
pgppgBJ44_fEr.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
|
