[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] rangeset: no need to use snprintf()



Hi Jan,

On 06/04/2021 09:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
As of the conversion to safe_strcpy() years ago there has been no need
anymore to use snprintf() to prevent storing a not-nul-terminated string.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx>


--- a/xen/common/rangeset.c
+++ b/xen/common/rangeset.c
@@ -436,14 +436,7 @@ struct rangeset *rangeset_new(
      BUG_ON(flags & ~RANGESETF_prettyprint_hex);
      r->flags = flags;
- if ( name != NULL )
-    {
-        safe_strcpy(r->name, name);
-    }
-    else
-    {
-        snprintf(r->name, sizeof(r->name), "(no name)");
-    }
+    safe_strcpy(r->name, name ?: "(no name)");

I realize the current code is not checking the return, but I wonder we should rather than silently truncating the string.

This is not a new issue, so it can dealt separately if we decide to check the return.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.