[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] x86: Introduce MSR_UNHANDLED
- To: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:40:07 -0500
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=oracle.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=oracle.com; dkim=pass header.d=oracle.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qsgfKHA7SbpMIqs/sjy9zD05l1oV79scyX26D+kZzhM=; b=AVpVKa78secgxHASsQbqTGcCbG0P+WleUY1a2TL0FsWHn1yiQp7I4i+B+Nt5mE1eNPmoVLzY56gsBC7JkNPu87FB3+GcvsIPmg0zfZhCq7ILqi0bGXSFf551CfLMJ/wuWpe8WZpBDRm1oFDrbRL0PEyYMwXSBUbZ67X8HYVBGvYHsPXlGBagDgMgRK8SngT9B0KwN7uDIImR0SIQVukGMl6Hgnxogp43hI9EfbA1y2sFco3dz0wVP/xyhF9oa9m0w/JL0TAMXNK8WM34eRhN/Yi2Fijvg0IIY3dpYBvmrwXFW4E905SWrRvRUojBkBEbY2+MwtXlGQ34YHlYfkcvfg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=n81Hz2ILaO21q6k9MQ65Zy047Vg8h7d1gaQ6XNZ1D/EUuaFA+79A6UpLKZJVdn0XzEdtv7jwXEVxY4X7y+HREA53rYEIfLLlji+hl5CPqog/+5hufyaxsU47NYGL3ocgSB+EVxw0kG9v5177pPk0MYpSxO6/Zzo/ZJDcpm0BGr7Tb8xscKrpSMOCFbXhpz5Fsu8BeyHhRvRB17YRA960LfG5o59ZCzwUYU27tQxRF5D9gTaXfxXtlatKnsLFbpr3cxQaEKcMYbQoBq7ic3utsRBL2USnL7g85E2Y0d/ZjZKez1hmts3M7Op/hj2r7+5+ftUZecwyPqrIrVdAXjaCpg==
- Authentication-results: intel.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;intel.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=oracle.com;
- Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wl@xxxxxxx, anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx, jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx, kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 16:40:35 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 2/23/21 11:11 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:39:48AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>> Before I do that though --- what was the conclusion on verbosity control?
> Ideally I would like to find a way to have a more generic interface to
> change verbosity level on a per-guest basis, but I haven't looked at
> all about how to do that, neither I think it would be acceptable to
> put that burden on you.
>
> Maybe we could introduce another flag to set whether ignored MSRs
> should be logged, as that would be easier to implement?
Probably.
msr_ignore=["verbose=<bool>", "<range>", "range>", ...]
-boris
>
> I think in that case we could enforce that either all ranges have the
> flag set or not, in order to prevent ending up tracking two different
> ranges of ignored MSRs, one that triggers a message and another one
> that doesn't.
>
> Thanks, Roger.
|
