[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] ISPENDR implementation (WAS Re: [linux-linus test] 159463: regressions - FAIL)
Hi all, On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 22:19, osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > flight 159463 linux-linus real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/159463/ [...] > test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle fail [...] > test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx pass While looking at the log to check whether we fixed the Arm bug, I noticed that Linux will boot on Thunder-X but not Seattle. >From the log: (XEN) d0v3: vGICD: unhandled word write 0x00000020000000 to ISPENDR44 Feb 18 17:01:19.426532 (XEN) traps.c:2013:d0v3 HSR=0x93820047 pc=0xffff8000104aec2c gva=0xffff80001000522c gpa=0x000000e111022c [...] Feb 18 17:01:19.618568 [ 27.097702] Call trace: Feb 18 17:01:19.618612 [ 27.100215] gic_retrigger+0x2c/0x38 Feb 18 17:01:19.630516 [ 27.103861] irq_startup+0x78/0x138 Feb 18 17:01:19.630575 [ 27.107419] __enable_irq+0x70/0x80 Feb 18 17:01:19.630622 [ 27.110978] enable_irq+0x50/0xa0 Feb 18 17:01:19.642499 [ 27.114363] xgbe_one_poll+0xc8/0xd8 Feb 18 17:01:19.642558 [ 27.118009] net_rx_action+0x110/0x3a8 Feb 18 17:01:19.642605 [ 27.121828] __do_softirq+0x124/0x288 Feb 18 17:01:19.654496 [ 27.125560] irq_exit+0xe0/0xf0 Feb 18 17:01:19.654555 [ 27.128772] __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0 Feb 18 17:01:19.654603 [ 27.132939] gic_handle_irq+0xa8/0xe0 Feb 18 17:01:19.654647 [ 27.136671] el1_irq+0xb0/0x180 Feb 18 17:01:19.666482 [ 27.139883] arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x28 Feb 18 17:01:19.666540 [ 27.143528] default_idle_call+0x24/0x5c Feb 18 17:01:19.666587 [ 27.147524] do_idle+0x204/0x278 Feb 18 17:01:19.678517 [ 27.150819] cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x68 Feb 18 17:01:19.678577 [ 27.154812] secondary_start_kernel+0x174/0x188 Feb 18 17:01:19.678625 [ 27.159415] Code: f9409063 d37e6821 91080021 8b010061 (b9000022) Feb 18 17:01:19.690480 [ 27.165582] ---[ end trace a7aadb3ae629b57f ]--- It looks like that Linux will now try to set the interrupt pending by writing ISPENDR when the interrupt is re-enabled. I think the ISPENDR write emulation is easier to implement compare to the other missing IS{PENDR, ACTIVER). It should be possible to emulate as follows: 1) For virtual interrupts, just call vgic_inject_irq() 2) For physical interrupts, set pending at the HW level. This will raise an interrupt that will call vgic_inject_irq(). The vGIC in KVM will directly set the physical interrupt active to avoid the round trip. But I am not sure we can do it safely in our current vGIC to avoid the guest de-activating the interrupt too early (the virtual interrupt may already be pending/active). Any thoughts? Cheers,
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |