[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [PATCH v2 4/8] xen/netback: fix spurious event detection for common event case
In case of a common event for rx and tx queue the event should be regarded to be spurious if no rx and no tx requests are pending. Unfortunately the condition for testing that is wrong causing to decide a event being spurious if no rx OR no tx requests are pending. Fix that plus using local variables for rx/tx pending indicators in order to split function calls and if condition. Fixes: 23025393dbeb3b ("xen/netback: use lateeoi irq binding") Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> --- V2: - new patch, fixing FreeBSD performance issue --- drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c index acb786d8b1d8..e02a4fbb74de 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c @@ -162,13 +162,15 @@ irqreturn_t xenvif_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) { struct xenvif_queue *queue = dev_id; int old; + bool has_rx, has_tx; old = atomic_fetch_or(NETBK_COMMON_EOI, &queue->eoi_pending); WARN(old, "Interrupt while EOI pending\n"); - /* Use bitwise or as we need to call both functions. */ - if ((!xenvif_handle_tx_interrupt(queue) | - !xenvif_handle_rx_interrupt(queue))) { + has_tx = xenvif_handle_tx_interrupt(queue); + has_rx = xenvif_handle_rx_interrupt(queue); + + if (!has_rx && !has_tx) { atomic_andnot(NETBK_COMMON_EOI, &queue->eoi_pending); xen_irq_lateeoi(irq, XEN_EOI_FLAG_SPURIOUS); } -- 2.26.2
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |