Re: [PATCH 2/7] xen/events: don't unmask an event channel when an eoi is pending

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 06.02.2021 11:49, Juergen Gross wrote:
> @@ -1798,6 +1818,29 @@ static void mask_ack_dynirq(struct irq_data *data)
>       ack_dynirq(data);
>  }
>  
> +static void lateeoi_ack_dynirq(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> +     struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(data->irq);
> +     evtchn_port_t evtchn = info ? info->evtchn : 0;
> +
> +     if (VALID_EVTCHN(evtchn)) {
> +             info->eoi_pending = true;
> +             mask_evtchn(evtchn);
> +     }
> +}
> +
> +static void lateeoi_mask_ack_dynirq(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> +     struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(data->irq);
> +     evtchn_port_t evtchn = info ? info->evtchn : 0;
> +
> +     if (VALID_EVTCHN(evtchn)) {
> +             info->masked = true;
> +             info->eoi_pending = true;
> +             mask_evtchn(evtchn);
> +     }
> +}
> +
>  static int retrigger_dynirq(struct irq_data *data)
>  {
>       evtchn_port_t evtchn = evtchn_from_irq(data->irq);
> @@ -2023,8 +2066,8 @@ static struct irq_chip xen_lateeoi_chip __read_mostly = 
> {
>       .irq_mask               = disable_dynirq,
>       .irq_unmask             = enable_dynirq,
>  
> -     .irq_ack                = mask_ack_dynirq,
> -     .irq_mask_ack           = mask_ack_dynirq,
> +     .irq_ack                = lateeoi_ack_dynirq,
> +     .irq_mask_ack           = lateeoi_mask_ack_dynirq,
>  
>       .irq_set_affinity       = set_affinity_irq,
>       .irq_retrigger          = retrigger_dynirq,
> 

Unlike the prior handler the two new ones don't call ack_dynirq()
anymore, and the description doesn't give a hint towards this
difference. As a consequence, clear_evtchn() also doesn't get
called anymore - patch 3 adds the calls, but claims an older
commit to have been at fault. _If_ ack_dynirq() indeed isn't to
be called here, shouldn't the clear_evtchn() calls get added
right here?

Jan