[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MAINTAINERS vs libxl

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:48:15 +0000
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel\@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:48:22 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

Jan Beulich writes ("MAINTAINERS vs libxl"):
> In commit 032a96e5ef38 tools/libxl/ was split into
> tools/libs/light/ and tools/libs/guest/. Wasn't the latter
> rather meant to be tools/libs/util/, as that's the other part
> of what had previously resided under tools/libxl/?

I think so, yes.

Ian.

References:
- MAINTAINERS vs libxl
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] xenstored: fix build on libc without O_CLOEXEC
Next by Date: RE: [PATCH v7 09/10] xen/vmtrace: support for VM forks
Previous by thread: MAINTAINERS vs libxl
Next by thread: Re: MAINTAINERS vs libxl
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.