|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH V4 00/24] IOREQ feature (+ virtio-mmio) on Arm
On 14.01.21 18:11, Ian Jackson wrote: Hi Ian Hi, thanks for giving this update. Since you were the only person who took the time to send such an update I feel I can spend some time on trying to help with any obstacles you may face. Thank you. Hence this enquiry: I think, yes. I hope, I addressed all review сomments/requests for V3. What are the major outstanding risks to this series and do you need any help from the Xen Project (eg from me as Release Manager) ? I would like to get the review for V4 for me to be able to make the required changes in time. Last 2 patches could be skipped for now, I don't expect the VirtIO to be in 4.15 (I keep these patches for visibility reason and test purposes): - libxl: Introduce basic virtio-mmio support on Arm - [RFC] libxl: Add support for virtio-disk configuration But, first 22 patches (IOREQ/DM) I would like to see in 4.15.Also what worries me the most is that a quite big series hasn't been fully tested on x86 (only build tested). NB I have not been following this series in detail - I'm just looking at your mail and your 00/ posting and so on. So if there is some blocker or risk I am probably unaware of it. I notice that there's one libxl RFC patch in there. Since that's in my bailiwick I will try to review it soon. Thank you, please note, this RFC patch is not a target for 4.15, no rush) For the next version I will drop these VirtIO related patches. -- Regards, Oleksandr Tyshchenko
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |