[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] x86: major paravirt cleanup
 
- To: Jürgen Groß <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
 
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 15:18:34 +0100
 
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx,	linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, luto@xxxxxxxxxx,	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>,	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>,	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Deep Shah <sdeep@xxxxxxxxxx>,	"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@xxxxxxxxxx>,	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>,	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx>,	Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>, Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>,	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>,	Ben Segall <bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>,	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 14:19:37 +0000
 
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
 
 
 
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:42:45PM +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> Peter,
> 
> On 23.11.20 14:43, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:53:42PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:46:18PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > >   30 files changed, 325 insertions(+), 598 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Much awesome ! I'll try and get that objtool thing sorted.
> > 
> > This seems to work for me. It isn't 100% accurate, because it doesn't
> > know about the direct call instruction, but I can either fudge that or
> > switching to static_call() will cure that.
> > 
> > It's not exactly pretty, but it should be straight forward.
> 
> Are you planning to send this out as an "official" patch, or should I
> include it in my series (in this case I'd need a variant with a proper
> commit message)?
Ah, I was waiting for Josh to have an opinion (and then sorta forgot
about the whole thing again). Let me refresh and provide at least a
Changelog.
 
 
    
     |