[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] domctl: introduce a new domain create flag, XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_evtchn_fifo, ...
- To: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 11:15:25 +0100
- Cc: 'Paul Durrant' <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxx>, 'Eslam Elnikety' <elnikety@xxxxxxxxxx>, 'Ian Jackson' <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 'Wei Liu' <wl@xxxxxxx>, 'Anthony PERARD' <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, 'Andrew Cooper' <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, 'George Dunlap' <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, 'Stefano Stabellini' <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, 'Christian Lindig' <christian.lindig@xxxxxxxxxx>, 'David Scott' <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>, 'Volodymyr Babchuk' <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, 'Roger Pau Monné' <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, paul@xxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 10:15:29 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 07.12.2020 11:04, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 07/12/2020 09:17, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 04.12.2020 12:45, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> You are making the assumption that the customer would have the choice to
>>> target a specific versions of Xen. This may be undesirable for a cloud
>>> provider as suddenly your customer may want to stick on the old version
>>> of Xen.
>>
>> I've gone from you saying "You really need a solution that can restore
>> the old VM environment, at least temporarily, for that customer." The
>> "temporarily" to me implies that it is at least an option to tie a
>> certain guest to a certain Xen version for in-guest upgrading purposes.
> >
>> If the deal with the customer doesn't include running on a certain Xen
>> version, I don't see how this could have non-temporary consequences to
>> the cloud provider.
>
> I think by "you", you mean Paul and not me?
Oh, right, I didn't pay attention to who wrote that text. Sorry.
Jan
- References:
- [PATCH v5 0/4] Xen ABI feature control
- [PATCH v5 1/4] domctl: introduce a new domain create flag, XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_evtchn_fifo, ...
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] domctl: introduce a new domain create flag, XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_evtchn_fifo, ...
- RE: [PATCH v5 1/4] domctl: introduce a new domain create flag, XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_evtchn_fifo, ...
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] domctl: introduce a new domain create flag, XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_evtchn_fifo, ...
- RE: [PATCH v5 1/4] domctl: introduce a new domain create flag, XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_evtchn_fifo, ...
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] domctl: introduce a new domain create flag, XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_evtchn_fifo, ...
- RE: [PATCH v5 1/4] domctl: introduce a new domain create flag, XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_evtchn_fifo, ...
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] domctl: introduce a new domain create flag, XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_evtchn_fifo, ...
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] domctl: introduce a new domain create flag, XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_evtchn_fifo, ...
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] domctl: introduce a new domain create flag, XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_evtchn_fifo, ...
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] domctl: introduce a new domain create flag, XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_evtchn_fifo, ...
|