| 
    
 [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] x86/xen: drop USERGS_SYSRET64 paravirt call
 On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 03:48:21PM +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> I wanted to avoid the additional NOPs for the bare metal case.
Yeah, in that case it gets optimized to a single NOP:
[    0.176692] SMP alternatives: ffffffff81a00068: [0:5) optimized NOPs: 0f 1f 
44 00 00
which is nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) and I don't think that's noticeable on
modern CPUs where a NOP is basically a rIP increment only and that goes
down the pipe almost for free. :-)
> If you don't mind them I can do as you are suggesting.
Yes pls, I think asm readability is more important than a 5-byte NOP.
Thx.
-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
 
  | 
  
![]()  | 
            
         Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our  |