Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm: entry: Place a speculation barrier following an ret instruction

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 19.08.2020 10:50, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 19/08/2020 09:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.08.2020 09:59, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>>> On 18 Aug 2020, at 18:34, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Btw - is there any need for this thread to be cross posted to both
>> xen-devel@ and security@? (I've dropped the latter here.)
> 
>  From the cover letter:
> 
> "The patch series is directly sent on the mailing list as the
> security team has been aware of the issues after the whitepaper was
> publicly released."
> 
> This is technically still a security issue except this is discussed in 
> the open as it is a zero day for us. An XSA will have to be issued in 
> due course. Hence why security@ is added to keep track of the conversation.

I thought cross-posting is generally considered bad practice. I can't
see what extra "keeping track of the conversation" gets added by CCing
security@: Everything will already be recorded in the list archives of
xen-devel.

For some background of my original question: The cross posting confuses
the rules I have set up in my mail client - the mail gets moved back
and forth between the two distinct folders for each of the lists. I
haven't been able to figure a non-clumsy way yet to avoid this
happening. The mail client we used to use until about a year ago did
not have any issue with the same scenario.

Jan